10 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

back of the home specifically. Applicant is proposing a second story addition which etctririd&entirely from the left side of the home to the right side of the home. From a factual perspective, what makes this situation unique and problematic, is the proximity of the applicant's home to its two rear neighbors, as well as the fact that the Eastern side next door neighbor's living room and kitchen views would be directly impacted by applicant's second story addition. The applicant's home sits at the end of a court (Homer Court) and backs up to two other homes which also sit at the end of a parallel court (Robin Court). Because of the original developer's need to make the home layouts work in these awkward, end -of- the -court, lot configurations, the applicant's home was set back significantly. In fact, the applicant's home sits back to such a degree that the actual structure is less than 10 feet from the two rear neighbor's fences. This creates a situation where a second story addition would be much more impacting than usual on both the privacy, sunlight, and sky views of both rear neighbors. There is no other two story home in the Val Vista development which was "revised" under similarly impacting (to all surrounding neighbor) circumstances. The Eastern side next door neighbor's (the Perry's) living room (front of the home view) looks out directly at the applicant's proposed second story addition. Moreover, because of the layout of the Eastern side neighbor's home, their kitchen view, which is located just around the corner from their living room, would also be directly impacted by the applicant's proposed second story addition. (Please see the Perry's objecting letter as to the impact the applicant's second story addition would have on their daily lives.) One of the distinctive features of our Val Vista neighborhood is its quaint, simple, and relatively old fashioned nature. This development was designed to be one of single story homes on reasonable size lots. It was not designed to resemble so many newer home developments which, to leverage the decreasing availability of land, are building their homes higher and closer together. We do not want to see the "style" of our neighborhood compromised in this fashion. Nor do we want to see our own lifestyles in the homes we have been living in for 41, 15, and 5 years respectively dramatically altered when there is simply nothing we can do about it. The Hoehnes are retired and the Persins will be retiring in the next five years. Our families have spent considerable time and money upgrading both the interiors and exteriors of our homes. We intend to live the remainder of our lives in our wonderful Pleasanton homes and we would like to continue to enjoy the privacy and outdoor views we have come to expect and which provide such a wonderful quality of life for us and our families. In this instance, we do not have the option of going back in time and recreating our homes and our lives. (Please see the Hoehne's objecting letter as to the impact the applicant's second story addition would have on their daily lives.) We realize the City tries not to get involved in disagreements regarding property valuations as this is generally a subjective area. Nevertheless, every real estate agent we have spoken to has told us there is a strong chance the appraised values of our homes would be reduced. Again, this is because of the proximity of our property lines to the applicant's home structure and the increased impact the applicant's proposed second story addition would have in this unique configuration situation. •