My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
011811
>
10 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2011 3:18:09 PM
Creation date
1/12/2011 1:17:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/18/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING <br />In accordance with code requirements and standard procedures, adjacent neighbors <br />were mailed notices regarding the Administrative Design Review application. During <br />the noticing process, staff received a phone call from Ms. Stephanie Persin, who lives <br />in one of the homes south of the subject property (6209 Robin Court). Ms. Persin <br />stated that she was concerned about privacy, lack of sunlight to her yard as a result of <br />the project, and that it may decrease the value of her home. She also commented that <br />a two -story home is not in keeping with the overall character of the neighborhood. Mr. <br />David Persin also summarized his wife's comments in an email. Staff also received a <br />phone call from Ms. Rox.ana Hoehne (6217 Robin Court), who has raised similar <br />concerns to that of Ms. Persin and stated that she would like to see a single -story <br />addition instead of a two - story addition. <br />The location of subject property and the neighboring properties that have appealed the <br />Zoning Administrator's decision are shown in the aerial photo below (Figure 3). <br />FIGURE 3: AERIAL MAP (GOGGLE MAPS) <br />Staff conducted a site visit of both the subject property and the neighboring properties <br />to the south prior to the Zoning Administrator hearing. The photos on the following <br />page show the view of the subject property from the rear yards of Mr. and Ms. Hoehne <br />and Mr. and Ms. Persin. Both the Hoehnes and the Persins would have view of the <br />proposed addition from their properties. In an effort to mitigate their concerns related to <br />privacy and view of the proposal, conditions of approval for the project required <br />Case No. PAP -146, Appeal of F'ADR -2090 <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />Planning Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.