Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dolan replied that the 15-day appeal period would start tonight following the <br />Commission’s action and that staff would have 40 days to schedule it for a Council <br />hearing. <br />Commissioner Pearce suggested making part of the motion the formation of a <br />subcommittee to meet with the appellant and the applicant. <br />Ms. Harryman agreed that the motion could be structured in that manner. <br />Chair Olson inquired which two Commissioners would form the subcommittee, and <br />Commissioners O’Connor and Narum volunteered to do so. <br />Commissioner Pearce moved to deny PAP-142, PAP-143, and PAP-144. thereby <br />upholding the Zoning Administrator’s approval of PDR-885 (Lot 4, 6168 Sanctuary <br />Lane), PDR-884 (Lot 2, 6136 Sanctuary Lane), and PDR-883 (Lot 1, 6120 Sanctuary <br />Lane), respectively, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A-3 for <br />PDR-885, Exhibit A-2 for PDR-884, and Exhibit A-1 for PDR-883, with the <br />modifications that: (1) the applicant add further detailing to the design of the <br />houses to meet the four-sided architectural requirements of the design guidelines <br />and to examine their massing relative to the design guidelines; (2) A <br />subcommittee consisting of Commissioners Narum and O’Connor work with the <br />Planning staff on the detailing of house designs. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Narum, O’Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Blank. <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2010-03 denying Case PAP-144, thereby upholding the Zoning <br />Administrator’s approval of Case PDR-883; PC-2010-04 denying Case PAP-143, <br />thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator’s approval of Case PDR-884; and <br />PC-2010-05 denying Case PAP-142, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator’s <br />approval of Case PDR-885, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Pearce suggested making another motion to uphold the appeal and deny <br />Cases PAP 140 and 141. <br />Ms. Harryman noted that Ponderosa Homes has withdrawn those applications and, <br />therefore, no action is necessary. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 10, 2010 Page 16 of 25 <br /> <br />