My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031010
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 031010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
1/4/2011 10:43:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Olson called for a five minute break at 8:06 p.m. and reconvened the regular <br />meeting at 8:11 p.m. <br />Mr. Briggs stated that Ponderosa’s response to the question of whether they would <br />Ponderosa <br />consider using five different floor plans is telling. He indicated that he felt <br />was <br /> not willing to be flexible and use anything other than the floor plans they have; that <br />they would rather not build on those lots than use two other floor plans from their <br />inventory. He added that he believed that if they get into discussing the three houses <br />and apply the design requirements to those houses, there will be the same inflexibility <br />and the houses will just be slightly tweaked by the use of trellises and wainscoting. He <br />noted that these houses do not meet that standard of the Mariposa Ranch and the Ruby <br />Hill custom homes. He expressed concern about Ponderosa’s inflexibility and <br />unwillingness to work with anyone on the floor plans because they want to build <br />production houses. <br />Mr. Briggs stated that he never received notice of the project and that when he learned <br />of it, he went to Ponderosa and discovered that they had to file an appeal immediately. <br />He noted that they spoke with Ponderosa, and they agreed that the neighbors would <br />send Ponderosa their questions and concerns about the project. He indicated that one <br />or two days after that meeting, they collectively sent a list of questions to Ponderosa, <br />and one month went by and they heard nothing. He added that they then heard from <br />staff that a hearing had been scheduled on the matter. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that he thought he heard Ms. Hardy say that she would <br />return with two other plans at a later date. <br />Ms. Hardy confirmed that she did say that, offering to move forward now with three <br />houses, each having an individual floor plan and elevation, and then returning with <br />different designs on the two remaining lots, which would be new design review <br />applications. <br />Jeff Schroeder, Ponderosa Homes, stated that when they bought the lots, they looked <br />at the lots and what the market would bear; they found out that the market will not bear <br />a custom home at this time because people cannot get loans to build homes. He noted <br />that the people who have purchased lots have never built homes in the communities <br />and could actually end up selling the lots at a loss, which is unfortunate. He stated that <br />they did make changes to the plans twice and reviewed where they wanted to be from a <br />cost standpoint to make it work for them. He added that they attempted to build homes <br />that would meet the design guidelines and fit in the community. He indicated that he <br />was not certain if they would come back and build on the two properties due to it being <br />a difficult economy. <br />Commissioner Pearce asked Mr. Schroeder if Ponderosa attempted to contact the <br />appellants and meet with them when they submitted questions to Ponderosa and <br />changes were made. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 10, 2010 Page 12 of 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.