11 ATTACHMENTS 6 TO 13 - Laserfiche WebLink

- James Paxson (Hacienda Business Park Owners Association) meeting (August 31, 2010) • A request was made for weather based moisture - detecting irrigation devices being required over the soil based devices. • A request was made for the City to do outreach to property management companies in this regard. • A request was made for that a "GREEN TEAM" with Daniel Smith, Director of Operation Services, to look at incentives. • A request was made for the City to offer help to the construction community that may want to submit to BIGTM or LEEDTM; an incentive to make it feel less imposing. • A suggestion was made for the presentation to be more focused on showing how Title 24 [State building code's energy requirements] gets a project through a lot of these points /measures. • A request was made for a memo to be provided before the September 16 meeting and that the attachments should be posted on the City's web page. - Pleasanton Downtown Association— Downtown Vitality Committee (September 7, 2010) • A concern was noted about impacts on the costs for building affordable housing. • A concern was noted about impacts of Proposition 23, if passed at the November general election, potentially repealing this code. • A concern was noted about the green costs for demolishing existing structures to build new green buildings. • A concern was noted about waste diversion requirements creating costs and feasibility challenges for small construction companies. • A suggestion was noted to find a way to provide all requirements in a list that a contractor can just insert into plans. • A concern was noted about discouraging development and revenue generation in the downtown. • A request was made to have information /updates provided. - Economic Vitality Commission (September 16, 2010) • A concern was noted that code requirements should not be added to in the hearing process. • A request for an understanding with the hearing bodies to not increase the requirements at the hearing stage. • A request for rebates to be part of the discussion. • A statement that the building industry will support a Tier 1 requirement but will not support a Tier 2 level. • A request for incentives to be part of this process, including how the City will help people to move into the new system and identify resources. • A request for the cost analysis to indicate the increase over the current code.