My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
010411
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2011 11:32:01 AM
Creation date
12/28/2010 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would want to know the delta between the City's existing LEED points and CALGreen <br /> plus Tier 1. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the delta between CALGreen and the City's is zero, as the City is <br /> trying to make them equivalent. <br /> Commissioner Blank presented a comparison between building a structure under the <br /> City's existing LEED requirements and now the same building can be built but must <br /> comply with the existing LEED points in the City plus CALGreen and Tier 1. He inquired <br /> what the cost difference would be between adding CALGreen and Tier 1 versus <br /> adhering to only the LEED requirements. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she asked this question at the Special Commission <br /> meeting because she was concerned that a developer would get 64 points for <br /> CALGreen Tier 1 versus 50 points with LEED, which is about a 30- percent increase in <br /> points. She indicated that staff's reply was that there are many things that can be done <br /> which do not cost a lot. She noted that what Commissioner Blank's question raises is <br /> whether there are incremental costs between what the City currently requires at <br /> 50 points versus the CALGreen Tier 1 level at 64 points. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that one way to address this question is to go back and look <br /> at recent residential projects and discuss this with developers to get an idea of whether <br /> there are added costs. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that staff does not believe there is a significant cost difference. He <br /> indicated that there are many alternatives one could use to meet requirements. He <br /> added that costing out every possibility is difficult; however, staff can look at providing <br /> additional numerical information. He reiterated that this has been an exercise to <br /> transition into a different system with no increased burden, and that the things that need <br /> to be done to be green have not changed; it is simply how a value is assigned. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired whether staff felt the City could go from a 50 point <br /> requirement up to a 64 point with no additional cost. <br /> Mrs. Rondash replied that there are current projects are already exceeding the 50 -point <br /> requirement on an 85- percent ratio. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that this is not required and cited the actual required <br /> increase as 28 percent. <br /> Mr. Corbett stated that in all systems, whether LEED, Build It Green, or CALGreen <br /> Tier 1, the requirement is for energy efficiency. He indicated that the idea is to exceed <br /> the minimum standards set by the State by 15 percent which is equal across all <br /> platforms, through individual measures and different electives that in CALGreen are <br /> comparable or close to comparable. He noted that there are some that are specific to a <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 11 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.