My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
010411
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2011 11:32:01 AM
Creation date
12/28/2010 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan replied that this would not be a major undertaking, but it would reduce the <br /> flexibility provided to the applicant. He explained that while it would count towards one <br /> of the requirements, it would force the applicant to pick a certain avenue. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted that every single commercial building he has seen as a <br /> Commissioner, including the Consent Calendar item on tonight's agenda, require <br /> "PV -ready with pull strings and pipes" as one of its conditions. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he is simply relaying to the Commission the feedback staff <br /> received from virtually every group staff they talked to. He stated that staff supports <br /> transitioning like for like into the new system but does not want to add to the <br /> requirements. He indicated that while this may be minor, it does reduce some amount <br /> of flexibility. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that the City would not be adding to the requirements but <br /> rather making this mandatory as one of the four electives. <br /> Commissioner Blank compared this to the requirement for sprinklers, stating that the <br /> City is taking such a long tirne to approve an automatic sprinkler ordinance, and now <br /> State code is mandating what the City has been implementing with Council guidance <br /> from the City Council that sprinklers be installed in every commercial and new <br /> residential buildings. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that his understanding from the minutes staff has <br /> received feedback from developers that if this Green Building ordinance is approved <br /> now, they do not want the Commission to "add on" further requirements. He indicated <br /> that this would be a good opportunity to mandate PV -ready so applicants better <br /> understand up front what is exactly required of them and are not taken by surprise. <br /> Commissioner Blank recalled that staff has yet to return to the Commission with <br /> information on the cost differences between requiring a building to be PV -ready while <br /> under construction versus adding it later on after the building has been constructed. <br /> Commissioner Narum stated that she believes this was in connection with the Staples <br /> Ranch project and the Auto Mall. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that said he believes that answer has been provided to the City <br /> Council. He added that he does not disagree with the Commission's conclusions but <br /> would simply like to report the feedback received from developers. He added that while <br /> this is something that appears to be relatively easy, some applicants flat out do not want <br /> to be mandated to do PV -ready and would prefer to address their requirements in a <br /> different way. <br /> Commissioner Pentin referred to the statement regarding weather - detecting devices <br /> being better than soil ones for irrigation purposes mentioned in page 2 of the "James <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.