My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2011
>
010411
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2011 11:32:01 AM
Creation date
12/28/2010 1:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/4/2011
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 1 TO 5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Corbett replied that there are different requirements for residential and for <br /> non - residential projects and that the requirement for separate meters is only for <br /> non - residential projects. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if staff envisions eventually requiring separate meters <br /> for residential projects for having grey water or recycling water for irrigation. <br /> Mr. Corbett replied that the City has had one large home in town where the owner <br /> installed a separate meter for irrigation purposes because irrigation water rates were <br /> much less expensive. <br /> Mrs. Rondash added that the City's Utilities Division indicated that if a residential project <br /> owner wanted to propose separate meters, they would potentially have lower bills and <br /> other fees may not be tacked on; however, this would be the property owner's option <br /> rather than a CALGreen requirement. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired what future incentives might be provided for residential <br /> homes utilizing separate meters for irrigation and landscaping purposes. <br /> Mrs. Rondash referred the question to Ms. Stern who handles the City's Climate Action <br /> Plan. <br /> Ms. Stern stated that this would be a good question for the Climate Action Plan and the <br /> Energy and Environment Committee to consider as part of the Plan. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if there were cities that offer incentives for Tier 1. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that she did not know whether other cities had enough experience or <br /> were already offering any incentives. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that it struck him that the City would limit green building <br /> requirements to commercial buildings greater than 20,000 square feet. He indicated <br /> that he realizes a 15,000 - square -foot building is not that large and inquired why it would <br /> not start at 10,000 square feet. <br /> Mrs. Rondash replied that the City's current ordinance specifies 20,000 square feet. <br /> She explained that when the ordinance was approved in 2002, it was understood that <br /> this was the break -even point where it would not be cost - prohibitive to incorporate these <br /> measures into that construction process. <br /> Commissioner Blank inquired if this was something staff could propose as a take -away <br /> because a lot of technology changes have occurred between 2002 and today, <br /> especially in the field of green building. He indicated that he would not be surprised if <br /> there were new measures and new construction techniques. He added that he cannot <br /> imagine that given construction costs today, a 15,000- square -foot building would be <br /> economically infeasible. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 29, 2010 Page 7 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.