My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121102
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 121102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:48:07 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:54:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />would he recommend. He told me the best care of all was definitely that provided <br />by Mercy Care in Oakland. <br /> <br />My mother called Mercy Care her home for the last 18 months of her life. <br />Through frequent contact with the staff, I saw her while she was cared for. In <br />contrast, I learned through prior experience how poorly run many nursing home <br />facilities frequently are. My brother, who lived in the East, visited several times, <br />and he was most impressed with everything done for our mother at Mercy Care. <br /> <br />When I learned of plans to develop a Mercy Care facility here in Pleasanton, <br />using the vacant land owned by St. Augustine's Church, I thought, how fortunate <br />for our community that our loved ones no longer able to live alone could find so <br />fine a home near us. Now it seems that a few neighbors are challenging the <br />proposed development. This is an all-too-frequent reaction to any change in the <br />status quo. <br /> <br />I am reminded that when plans were announced ten years ago for a new two-story <br />high multipurpose auditorium at the elementary school opposite our house, some <br />neighbors (including us) immediately opposed this development because it was <br />out of scale with the existing homes. However, when constructed, the auditorium <br />was well-screened by a number of evergreen trees. The initial opposition to this <br />improvement now seems both quaint and misguided. <br /> <br />Traffic in the neighborhood has become a problem, although it didn't result from <br />the new auditorium. Enrollment at the school has greatly increased. This, coupled <br />with the parents' need to drive the kids to school, is the cause. We now have <br />virtual gridlock at 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. But guess what - the traffic completely <br />dissipates. We've learned how to live with this problem, and for the vast majority <br />of the day and night, our neighborhood is pretty much the way it was when we <br />moved in 24 years ago. <br /> <br />I think that the proposed Mercy Care facility would be a great boon to Pleasanton. <br />I know from personal experience it would be a first-class facility, and would <br />provide a critically needed resource for families in our city who must find a good <br />home for their ailing parents or loved ones. The opposition to the project will be <br />understandable as a typical response to anything new, but it must not be blown <br />out of proportion. The simple fact is that this community needs Mercy Care. The <br />proposed plans have been carefully drawn; the facility won't generate the kind of <br />traffic at all hours that a hospital would, and the impact on the neighborhood <br />foreseen by the opponents most likely will be much less than envisioned. The <br />greater good resulting from this proposal to the entire community of Pleasanton <br />exceeds any minimal inconvenience, and as we have in our neighborhood, I hope <br />the neighbors can learn to live with it." <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />December 11,2002 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.