PC 111302 - Laserfiche WebLink

,"- Commissioner Arkin inquired why the application took so long to process. Mr. Iserson replied that this was due to many factors including the peer review process, the neighborhood meeting, and staff's task of ensuring that all Code requirements were met and dealing with the appellant prior to his appeal to explain the project. Commissioner Sullivan indicated his support for the continuance. He suggested not continuing it again if the appellant is absent again. He noted that the Commission routinely continues appeals based on appellants' requests and felt that the appellant ought to be given a chance to express his position. Commissioner Sullivan moved to continue PAP-39 (PDR-191). Commissioner Arkin proposed an amendment to the motion to indicate that there would be no further continuance of the item and that a decision would be made at the next meeting. Commissioner Sullivan amended his initial motion to include that the item not be further continued on the basis of the appellant's failure to appear at the next meeting. Chairperson Maas seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE ,-- AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan Commissioner Kameny None None c. PUD-19. Colma Draval!:e. Inc./Nolan Farm Application for PUD development plan approval to subdivide an existing 1.8:t-acre lot into two lots: a 1.6:t-acre lot and a 10, 602-square-foot lot, each with an existing home, on property located at 10 15 and 1027 Rose Avenue. . Zoning for the property is PUD -- MDR (Planned Unit Development -- Medium Density Residential) District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report, explaining that the subject site is a remainder parcel of the recently completed Nolan Farm development and contains two houses - the Nolan home and a Queen Anne-style cottage. He stated that this proposal to create two lots to reflect each of the existing homes was anticipated during the PUD process for the original development. He indicated that the conceptual plan included in the Commissioners' packets is intended for a future proposal and that the PUD proposal at this time is simply for the creation of two lots. ,.... Mr. Iserson noted that the PUD proposal for the subject site, bordered by the Nolan Farm development on three sides and the Alameda County Fairgrounds on the fourth side, meets the land use and density requirements of the General Plan. He added that the first lot containing the Nolan home and measuring approximately 1.6 acres could be further subdivided into four parcels at some future time and would be subject to the development standards of the R-I-40,000 zoning district, while the 1O,602-square-foot second lot with the cottage would be subject to the R-I-IO,OOO zoning district. He stated that both parcels would be consistent with the standards of PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 13, 2002 Page 6