Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r Commissioner Roberts asked staff what bars remain open until 2:00 a.m. Mr. Iserson replied <br />that he was not sure but that he thinks Pleasanton Hotel, Union Jack, and Main Street Brewery <br />are open, and they are all inside bars. <br /> <br />Ms. Kendra Buchspics, 6114 Hansen Drive, stated that she is a regular at Toby's. She indicated <br />that Ms. Chadsey strictly monitors the noise in the restaurant. She noted that it appears only the <br />business is being asked to make a compromise although both participate in the community and <br />pay taxes. She commented that the economy has changed in the last few years which <br />necessitated a business adjustment to bring revenues in. She requested the Commission to look <br />into the long-term viability of whatever business may be at the site and consider how it may <br />affect Pleasanton in the next 15 to 20 years. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael O'Callaghan, 125 W. Neal Street, stated that he is a strong advocate for Downtown <br />businesses. He commented that the many times he has sat in his car with the windows down in <br />front of the Convery's house for 20 minutes at a time, he did not hear the music from Toby's, <br />He added that he has some acoustical experience and has built many acoustical assemblies. He <br />mentioned that the ceiling is workable without sacrificing the integrity of building by stapling <br />black acoustic tiles to the ceiling. He agreed that double-paned windows will not absorb sound <br />unless they are draped and that it would cost only a minimal amount for Toby's to hang some <br />tapestries from the ceiling. He concluded that both neighbors and business owner need to give <br />and take to solve the problem. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 9:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas reconvened the meeting at 9:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan requested to hear from Commissioner Roberts about her experience of <br />working with the neighbors. <br /> <br />,.-. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts stated that at the September meeting, she was bothered that the business <br />had not installed the easiest and cheapest mitigation measure - the automatic self-closing device <br />on the door. She stated that she was disappointed that it was not done until the staff report <br />mentioned it because the primary cause of the noise problem was leaving that door open. She <br />mentioned that she understood the business' tight budget and how the owners do not want to <br />invest in tenant improvement. She explained how both the business owner and the neighbors <br />were doing just about what they could to solve the issue without being confrontational. She <br />added that Mr. Hobbie presented some inexpensive solutions like installing plastic sheets over <br />the windows to prevent the sound from escaping. She noted that requiring the business to <br />mitigate noise is not an unusual request because other conditional use permits in the City such as <br />a martial arts school or dance studio have been required to attenuate noise so as not to bother the <br />neighbors and nearby businesses. She expressed disappointment that the acoustical firm did not <br />provide expertise or estimates and stated that it was not the City's role to put money into a <br />business. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />November 13, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />