My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102302
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 102302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:15 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:44:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/23/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 102302
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,r <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman presented the following letter from Deborah Bachrach and Ralph Cavenaugh, <br />National Resource Defense Council: <br /> <br />"We applaud the Pleasanton Energy Advisory Group for drafting the city of Pleasant on's <br />Draft Energy Plan, to actively engage the City and its residents in energy issues. We <br />endorse the plan's goal to pursue 'measures that help create clean, reliable, economical, <br />and energy efficient systems. NRDC actively supports efforts to capture cost-effective <br />energy efficiency opportunities, develop renewable sources of energy, and support clean <br />distributed generation." <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />She noted that they described points of the Energy Plan that they considered to be particularly <br />important, including locally distributed generation technologies. They suggested that the Energy <br />Advisory Group modify the document to favor only clean distributed generation technologies, <br />meeting the goals of California Air Resources Board's new regulations for distributed <br />technology, effective 2007. The Plan highlights Pleasanton's praiseworthy conservative efforts <br />during 200 I, and suggested that the following sentence, "Due to conscious conservation efforts, <br />the reductions in use were not totally at the expense of basic personal necessities or mission <br />critical business operations" be rephrased to more closely capture what they believed to be the intent <br />of the authors: "The conservation efforts over the past year reduced Pleasanton residents' and <br />businesses' energy bills without compromising quality of life or critical business operations. In <br />fact, many of these efforts have improved quality of life and increased business profitability for <br />customers who installed energy efficient technologies that provided improved service, while <br />simultaneously lowering energy bills." <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman noted that the following letter outlined Adam Browning and David Hochchild of <br />Vote Solar's support of the City's efforts to develop the Energy Plan. <br /> <br />"Dear Mayor Pico and City Council Members: <br /> <br />Weare writing in support of elements in the Draft Pleasanton Energy Plan. the Vote <br />Solar initiative is a new non-profit organization borne out of the successful campaign last <br />fall to pass a $100 million solar revenue bond measure in San Francisco. We are now <br />working to help other cities implement solar bonds on their own because we believe that <br />local government victories like this offer the most promising opportunity to jumpstart this <br />nation's transition to renewable energy, preventing toxic emissions, and making progress <br />in the fight against global warming. <br /> <br />The Draft Pleasanton Energy Plan envisions a city that seeks to reduce its energy related <br />environmental footprint. Element 4.g. of the Plan specifically calls for a feasibility study <br />to evaluate the potential for revenue bond funding for renewable energy projects. Should <br />the city go forward with such a plan, it will find itself in good company, as cities from <br />San Diego to New York are looking at solar bonds as a way of cost effectively increasing <br />their energy independence. <br /> <br />,--. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />October 23, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.