Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- <br /> <br />Ms. Sommer commended the Planning Commissioners for their vision and initiative in <br />adopting a Green Building Ordinance. She believed it was a very significant step that a <br />local jurisdiction could take in moving towards sustainability and stewardship. She <br />believed it could reverse negative impacts that had already occurred. She noted that <br />neighboring cities in Alameda County were watching this process, and were waiting for <br />the Green Building Ordinance to be adopted. She supported a regional approach, and <br />believed this was an important first step. She thanked City staff, particularly Ms. Maier, <br />for their thoroughness and objectivity in approaching this Ordinance. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Ms. Sommer noted that public <br />recognition of developers who implement the green building standards may be <br />recognized during City Council and Plarming Commission meetings. She noted that <br />developers would like to see a streamlined permitting process. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Geof Syphers wished to underscore Mr. Gottfried's points about costs, and added that <br />three years ago, the higher first costs were due to commissioning costs. Those costs have <br />been reduced significantly as familiarity with the green building standards has become <br />more widespread. He added that costs had also been reduced as developers recognized <br />the inevitability of the adoption of green building standards. He noted that major <br />manufacturers have adapted to the trend; all of Kelly-Moore's paints are LEED qualified <br />as of January, 2003. In addition, every kind of insulation manufactured by Johns- <br />Manville will be formaldehyde-free. He noted that those changes were direct responses <br />to the LEED system, and to cities like Pleasanton that adopted these standards. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Maier confirmed that the City <br />Council would hear this item on October 15,2002, ifit were approved by the Plarming <br />Commission. Commissioner Arkin believed it was important that the cost issues be <br />articulated before the Council during that hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that this Ordinance had been a long time coming, and he <br />was glad that it was finally being finalized. He wished to thank Ms. Maier, Ms. Sommer, <br />and Mr. Syphers for working so hard to put the Ordinance and the framework together in <br />a way that was acceptable to the development cOmniunity, the Commission, and the <br />community at large. He noted that they had done an excellent job in accomplishing those <br />goals, especially during some difficult times. He also wished to thank Brian Swift and <br />Deborah Acosta-McKeehan for responding the Plarming Commission's requests to <br />develop the Ordinance, and for their support in getting it to the Commission. He thanked <br />David Gottfried for attending the meeting, and noted that it was an honor to have him <br />present. He hoped that Mr. Gottfried would be able to attend the City Council meeting, <br />and believed that it was critical that he be able to present this information to the City <br />Council. <br /> <br />,--. <br /> <br />Connnissioner Sullivan noted that the planet has limited resources, and a fInite ability to <br />provide the natural systems necessary to support life. He believed that the Planning <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 25, 2002' <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />