04 ATTACHMENT 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pleasanton TOD Standards and Design Guidelines Residential Building Matrix (all buildings types can accommodate mixed -uses) TYPE DENSITY / PRKG. RATIO STORIES COMMENTS PARCEL SIZE (TYPE) ATTACHED ROW HOUSES TUCK UNDER r • 1. r $'� 1 i Least Cost per unit as • y ., � .,: e � 14 - du /ac. 1 1.5 - 2 spit). i 3 st. parking cost is low t : ! I However greater use of �' 3 - 3.5 acres 1 (tudander prkg.)1 land for afford. Hsg. � • . r (for 75 units) ! ! means less mkt. rate hsa� GARDEN STYLE APARTMENTS WITH SURFACE PARKING Leas[ Cast per unit as •., , , �� . 20 -25 du /ac 1.67 -1.8 sp /u. 3 st. parking cost is low a' ill LI I Lw; ! ! However greater use of -• C. rA 1 = 3 -3.5 acres j (surface prkg.) 1 .land for afford. Hsu. ....-, _ (for 75 units) ! ! .means less mkt. rate hsg. TUCK UNDER PODIUM • I I Least Cost per unit as 25 -90 du /ac. 1.5 -1.8 sp/u. 1 3-4 st. parking cost is low s w • 4! -0rlentation simlar to 1 acre min (surface prkg.) rowhouses and townhouses 10•••18 -ean t 2+ acres typ TOWNHOUSE FLATS WITH PODIUM! PARKING ( I y, .1 ra ' 90 -60 du /ac. 1- 1.5sp /u. Most [ypaal high density ,�.1w.. " 9 st. type y . _ 2' I • 1.25 -1.75 aces podium sCNCY. 0 If i 1 P E r( • (for 75 units) st. - visitor 'Best with low S -• nmu parking ratio(1:1) RESIDENTIAL WRAP BUILDING WITH PARKING STRUCTURE 77 7. 1 40 -70 du /ac. ! 1- 1.67sp /u. ! Most cost effective, but qa..t U p� 7 -3 acres multi -Ivl. i 3 -4 st. generally requires larger I ! _ 0 100 -150 units structure j5 st. poss.'.project to justify parking 4 —,,,, • Y ' minimum ! st. - visitor ! structure; 1 larger site. • RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS WITH OFF SITE PARKING DISTRICT SIIMMIBM � , 50 -80 du/ac. i 1 -2 sp /u. Satehte Parking Structure :r '- - 2 -3.5 ac es ! off site ! 3 -4 st. 'limited site prkg. 4 for 100 -150u multi -Ivl. Struct 15 st. Loss. Allows for greater density r , ! st. - visitor ! Cost effective strict. Prkg. .. , • t k r r _ 1 due to size of c. Of scale City of Pleasanton - 34 - STUDY SESSION: 12/16/2010