PC 082802 - Laserfiche WebLink

_ Haggerty to decide at one public meeting which streets may be privatized and/or closed. He believed that it should involve more input from the public. While it would benefit the people of Happy Valley, it would affect many more people than the residents ofthat area. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Mr. Iserson advised that the Tentative Map was to implement the PUD by subdividing the property and the lots. The access to both the developments may be provided through alternate means. While the Bypass Road was the ultimate plan for providing access in the area, staff believed that the alternate access through Happy Valley and Alisal can provide the necessary access to the development until the Bypass Road is completed. Mr. Rasmussen discussed the alignment of the Sycamore Specific Plan and the Happy Valley Specific Plan to create the entire Bypass Road. The golf course project, the PUD, and the Tentative Map were designed to be completely consistent with the Happy Valley Specific Plan. The two lots of the TTK development area were never intended to connect with the Bypass Road. A discussion of the implementation of the two Specific Plans and the Bypass Road with relation to the golf course ensued. - In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Rasmussen replied that the TTK subdivision plan could not stand on its own regarding the twelve lots. It would not have its own sewer and water lines, and it relied on the golf course project for those utilities. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Maas, Mr. Rasmussen replied that the Commission could approve the Tentative Map and the City Council could approve the Final Map. He added that the Commission's action on the Tentative Map could be appealed to City Council. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Rasmussen noted that Mr. Spotorno was concerned about the Bypass Road's feasibility. Mr. Spotorno would like to explore other alignments with the City, and the City could explore a number of alternatives. He noted that the density transfer would not necessarily be quarter acre lots. He noted that if someone requested an amendment to the Specific Plan, it would return to the Plarming Commission. The City would have to do the environmental analysis, examine the alternatives, road alignments and densities, all of which would be open to public discussion. He added that neighborhood meetings would be held, the Plarming Commission would hear the matter, and that the EIR, Specific Plan, and General Plan processes would be followed before a decision could be made. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Rasmussen indicated that the City would like to move ahead on this item. r-. Plarming Commission Minutes August 28, 2002 Page 9