Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,--- <br /> <br />residence facilities ensued. He noted that they were great believers in context, both with <br />relation to the city, and within the facility itself. He added that there was an attractive mix <br />of materials that allowed the facility to blend with the adjacent community. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Vera Goupille replied that it was <br />desirable for residents to have roommates, and that two-thirds of the dementia patients <br />would be doubled up. She noted that the patients tended to do better with another person <br />in the room because they probably have lived most oftheir adult life with another person. <br />In the assisted living facility, the resident would room with another member oftheir <br />family (husband and wife, a parent, or a sibling). Regarding the parking requirements <br />during holidays, she noted that the residents tended to go home, and that there was no <br />extra parking load. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Goupille indicated that a married <br />couple could live in the facility if only one of them was in need of assisted living. She <br />added that generally, the food was served in bulk and served family-style. She added that <br />the assisted living units were equipped with kitchenettes, containing a microwave, <br />refrigerator, sink, and a toaster oven. She noted that the dementia units would not have <br />any kitchen facilities. The facility would not have any stoves in the residence units. She <br />noted that the residents liked to help, and would be able to wash their own dishes. <br /> <br />...----. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Goupille replied that there <br />would be a price break if a unit was shared. She added that in the assisted living, only a <br />couple or relatives would be able to share. A shared unit in the dementia unit would also <br />be less expensive than a single occupancy unit, and that there would be economies of <br />scale. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Goupille replied that as a <br />nonprofit facility, they would be less expensive than other market rate assisted living <br />facilities. She noted that their rates were between one-third to one-half of the market <br />rates, and that they alone had a sliding payment scale. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Goupille replied that the facility <br />would not fill up immediately upon opening. She added that the decision to move to an <br />assisted living facility was a major one that families considered carefully and discussed <br />for some time. <br /> <br />".-. <br /> <br />Christine Steiner, 596 Hamilton Way, thanked the Planning Commission for helping to <br />bring this facility to fruition. She complimented Carol Galante and Vera Goupille for <br />their dedication and hard work during this seven-year-long process. She believed this <br />project was a winner, and that it would set the pace for the Bay Area, particular in terms <br />of affordability. She believed this facility would take care of people in a caring and <br />attentive way, and that it would free up some other units that are currently occupied. She <br />noted that they visited and studied approximately 80% ofthe assisted living facilities in <br />Northern California during the development phase. She believed that the non-profit <br />structure would be beneficial for the residents, and hoped that it would be an award- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />August 14,2002 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />