PC 072402 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Roberts corrected the last sentence of the last paragraph on page 14 to read: "She _ noted that porches were not necessarily appropriate for Southern French villages as they were for Neo-traditional, American, turn-of-the-century, Victorian, and/or Craftsman homes in other projects." Commissioner Arkin clarified the motion of page 18, noting that for "Item 1" the Planning Commission agreed that this item would be deferred to staff to determine the best way to ensure the completion of the vineyard planting; "Item 6" the whole house fan would be an option for the purchaser; and "Item 8" the disclosure would be posted in the sales office. Commissioner Arkin revised his comments on page 19 to read: "Commissioner Arkin supported this plan because ofthe five added conditions." The minutes of the July 10,2002 meeting were approved as revised 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There were none. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA - Mr. Swift advised that Item 6.b., PAP-31 (PV-68/PADR-560, Therese and Reid Miller) was withdrawn. He further advised that the owners of The Marque had requested a continuance of Item 6.c. Following discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to hear the item this evening. Item 6.e., PUD-02-3M and PCUP-6l, Bernal Partners, L.L.C. was continued to August 14,2002. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS a. PUD-18, PGPA-04, Ponderosa Homes (Busch Property) Application for Planned Unit Development (PUD) prezoning and development plan approval for a 192-10t single family residential subdivision, a 172-unit senior apartment development, an approximately 6.0 acre church facility, and a 23-acre public school facility designation, on a 92-acre site located northwesterly of the Operations Service Center and bounded by Mohr Avenue, Busch Road, and the former Southern Pacific Railroad Corridor. The proposal involves an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to remove a Neighborhood Park designation, add a Public and Institutional designation, add a Public and Institutional/ Medium Density Residential Designation, and reduce the acreages designated as Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. The property is not currently within the incorporated limits of Pleasanton and, therefore, does not have a City zoning designation. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for this project. - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 24, 2002 Page 2