PC 102401 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Croeni provided information regarding the requested modification for increased building ,-. height, noting that the lower two-story buildings will be in closer proximity to Sunol Blvd., and the three-story buildings will be located at the back of the site. He advised that he feels this is an improvement over the original PUD. He provided a photo depicting the height of the former Kaiser building and the proposed grading. He noted that the Building A (which is the tallest building) parapet will be 12 feet lower than the former building. Mr. Croeni explained the reason for the need of the 2-1/2 foot height increase, commenting that the additional height is needed to accommodate the duct systems needed for the functions of the Applied Biosystems business. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Croeni advised that the information he presented did not include the mechanical screening for the existing nor the proposed buildings. Mr. Croeni advised that one of the issues from the onset of the project was the balance of making the buildings fit in and blend, and the prominent position of this site. He noted that there has been a lot of discussion and interest in the appropriate expression of these buldings as gateway buildings. He advised that he has been working with Larry Cannon to find ways to alter the architecture of the south end of Building A and options for introducing Applied Biosystems' corporate identification on this building. He presented an exhibit showing the AIB logo on Building A. Discussion ensued regarding options for this elevation. Commissioner Arkin suggested that the options be presented for the Commission's review. "....... Stevens Williams ofMBT Architects described the design of the south end of Building A and the options for the outer layer of the building (metallic screen, relatively clear glass, or glass which is somewhat tinted.) Mr. Croeni advised that there is an opportunity for public art in this area, but at this time it is not an integral part of the design. Commissioner Arkin advised that he likes the current design of the building. Discussion ensued regarding the possibilities for the design of this elevation. Mr. Croeni presented the proposed building material options, noting that they would prepare a larger mock -up to be viewed on the site prior to the final determination. Mr Sage advised that an external smoking area has not been identified, but that it would not be near the entry point of the building. Commissioner Arkin stated that he would like to have it located in a remote covered area. Mr. Gates presented the stone materials proposed for the rock wall and other design features. Mr. Sage commented that the analysis of the treatment of the south-facing elevation of Building A is related to discussion with Mr. Cannon and his comments that perhaps some variation could be considered for this building. Mr. Sage advised that they are happy to work with staff and the peer review architect to arrive at a mutually satisfying solution. He noted that they felt the original design was adequate for the presentation, but they would like to explore some of the other ideas, while still moving forward with the project. He further noted that they would also PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 24,2001 Page 4