PC 052301 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pulino advised that he was not aware ~ of the conditions of approval on this building. Mr. Buckel advised that Mr. Pulino is purchasing the building from someone who is contract with Panattoni Development. Commissioner Harvey asked if there was something attached to the purchase that would require the installation of a photovoItaic system at a later point in time (three to five years from now), would Mr. Pulino have a problem with that in principle. Mr. Pulino stated that he and his partner have had discussions about having some type of energy back-up, but they currently cannot afford it. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED ~ Chairperson Sullivan commented that this is the first energy efficient project seen in Pleasanton and it is unfortunate that the financing was subsidized by the government and the funding is no longer available. He stated that he has difficulty asking the developer to come up with $1 million that he never anticipated needing to install the system. He stated that the City's Energy Committee will be meeting on June 13 and begin the process of developing a City energy strategy. Chairperson Sullivan stated that he would like to give Panattoni Development some additional time (although he is not sure if it should be six months or one year), and in parallel with the development of the City strategy, see how a program can be developed for an on-site renewable system to work at this building. He stated that he wants to see something more than a 6 Kwh system. He noted that he does not know if $100,000 is the right amount and does not know the way to guarantee it. He advised that he is suggesting that the developer put up some amount of money and they work to develop a program better than the 6 Kwh. He also advised that he would suggest that the building occupancy be allowed. Commissioner Harvey stated that he would like to see a time frame for the development of the plan as well as a time frame for the installation. Chairperson Sullivan stated that the development of an energy strategy will take a year, and he feels Panattoni should be given one year to develop the plan and an additional year to have it installed. He also advised that the plan should be brought back to the Planning Commission, in conjunction with the Energy Committee. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Kline advised that a PUD application has been filed for other five buildings and that will be coming to the Planning Commission within the next few months. Mr. Buckel clarified that Panattoni does not currently after a contractual agreement with the Best family for the five additional buildings. Mr. Pavan suggested that the Commission consider establishing a level of output for the system, rather than a monetary amount. He advised that staff is recommending the installation of a minimum 75 Kwh system, but the Commission could reduce that amount. Mr. Pavan also suggested that any stipulation be reflected in a deed restriction for the buildings. Discussion ensued regarding the requirements associated with the deed restrictions and the appropriate means for insuring that the systems can and will be installed. .~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2001 Page 15