PC 041101 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA r- Item 6.b., Tract Map 7240, Mardel L.L.C. (Deleo Builders) was continued to the April 25, 2001 meeting. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION a. PUD-3, Clay and Schelly Frades Application for PUD development plan approval to subdivide an existing 77.5 acre parcel located at 4120 Foothill Road into three parcels measuring approximately 61.16 acres, 11.22 acres, and 5.09 acres. The 61.16 acre parcel would contain an existing single- family dwelling, two existing secondary units, and two existing garages/storage barns. On the 11.22 acre parcel, a future home would be developed with a maximum size of 6,500 square feet. On the 5.09 acre parcel, a new 4,680 square foot, two-story home is proposed. The property is prezoned PUD (Planned Unit Development) - A (Agriculture) and PUD-RDR (Rural Density Residential) zoning district. Marion Pavan presented the staff report providing development history of the property and an overview of the proposal, including visibility, height recommendations, and the biological analysis. He noted that the applicant has reviewed the conditions of approval and has indicated agreement. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pavan advised that the pads were graded according to County approvals. Mr. Grubstick advised that City sewer and water were r- provided through a preannexation agreement. Staff provided clarification as to the location of the Urban Growth Boundary line on these properties. Commissioner Arkin asked what would ensure that the property could not be further subdivided. Ms. Seto advised that the Planning staff had discussed this matter with the applicants. She further advised that East Bay Regional Park District is only interested in receiving a trail easement and is not interested in receiving any conservation easement or holding title over a larger area of property, because they do not feel it would work with their master plan for the Pleasanton Ridge. She noted that there are two layers of protection to prevent further development: the City Council, and the requirement that an initiative would be needed to allow development above the 670-foot line. Discussion ensued regarding the Urban Growth Boundary line and where it runs through the property. Mr. Pavan noted that there are a number of constraints on this property to prevent increased density for this property. Commissioners Roberts, Kameny, and Sullivan advised that they viewed the property with Mrs. Frades. In response to an inquiry from Chairperson Sullivan, Mr. Pavan advised that Fish and Game were not contacted regarding this development proposal. r- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April II, 2001 Page 2