My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
120710
>
19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2010 4:27:41 PM
Creation date
12/1/2010 4:27:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> DRAFT <br /> PRZ -58, City of Pleasanton, Hacienda Business Park Rezoninqs <br /> Application to rezone three sites in Hacienda Business Park to require residential <br /> development plans meet certain core standards related to density, affordability <br /> and unit mix, consistent with the settlement agreement approved by the City <br /> Council on August 17, 2010 in the case of Urban Habitat v. City of Pleasanton. <br /> The sites are: (1) The W.P. Carey site at the southeast corner of Owens Drive and <br /> Willow Road (Assessor's Parcel No. 941 - 2778 - 013 -00 and part of <br /> APN 941 - 2778 - 012 -00); (2) The BRE site at the north corner of Hacienda Drive and <br /> Gibraltar Drive (APN 941 - 2778 - 011 -00); and (3) The Roche Molecular Systems site, <br /> south of Gibraltar Drive between Willow Road and Hacienda Drive (a portion of <br /> APN 941 - 2761 - 003 -00). Zoning for the properties is PUD -MU (Planned Unit <br /> Development — Mixed Use) District. <br /> Steve Reichenbach stated that he has been a resident of the Avila development for the <br /> past 14 years and expressed concern regarding integration and affordable housing. He <br /> noted that the three properties proposed for rezoning are very close together, are <br /> isolated, and are already in a high density area, and that adding high- density housing in <br /> a small area would be equivalent to segregating the less affluent, affordable housing <br /> rather than integrating it into the community. <br /> Mr. Reichenback stated that affordable housing developments should be proposed for <br /> commuter sites and areas of urban renewal, which Pleasanton is not. He questioned <br /> the inconsistency of having people live in this area but near public transportation so they <br /> can commute out of the area. He urged the Commission to scrutinize and plan for the <br /> community's long -term needs, as these would outlast its short -term, economic and <br /> affordable housing needs. <br /> Chair Olson advised that this matter would come before the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Blank moved to recommend approval of Case PRZ -58 to rezone <br /> the three sites in Hacienda Business Park. <br /> Commissioner Pentin seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, O'Connor, Olson, and Pentin. <br /> NOES: None. <br /> ABSTAIN: None. <br /> RECUSED: None. <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner Pearce. <br /> Resolution No. PC- 2010 -27 recommending approval of Case PRZ -58 was entered and <br /> adopted as motioned. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/10/2010 Page 1 of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.