CCMIN100510 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember McGovern referred to the Planning Commission minutes and confirmed with staff that the CEQA review period had ended and no additional comments were received. Councilmember Sullivan asked staff to discuss Title 24 CALGreen and how that relates to LEED standards, which is in the City's ordinance. Mr. Dolan explained the condition of approval was crafted to allow for each because of the upcoming transition to CALGreen. The timing of the applicant's request for a building permit will determine which set of regulations Clorox is subject to, and how that compares to LEED standards is dependent upon which level of CALGreen the City chooses to adopt, which the Council will consider in the coming weeks. Councilmember Sullivan referred to Condition of Approval No. 25, which discusses water efficient landscape. This, along with other elements of the Green Building Ordinance, should be revisited as part of the Climate Action Plan process. He referred to Conditions of Approval No. 13 and 30, which discuss waste diversion and enclosures. He acknowledged the commercial separated recycling program had yet to be implemented but said he would like to see these new commercials buildings set up to accommodate it. Councilmember McGovern requested clarification on Condition of Approval No. 19. She asked if buildings A through E were built to be PV compatible. Mr. Dolan said no, the condition merely states that if the applicant were to apply for substantial changes to any of those buildings, renewable energy sources would be pursued. Building F would be built PV ready. Councilmember McGovern asked if photovoltaic panels would realize the 12.5% energy use savings identified in the condition, and staff could not confirm. Councilmember McGovern said buildings A through E are unlikely to be significantly upgraded in the near future and, since building F would be PV ready, she would like the condition reworded to favor that. Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. There were no public speakers, and she immediately closed the public hearing. Mr. Fialho said Councilmember McGovern's request could be reflected in the conditions of approval, should the Council desire. He reviewed the Council's changes as follows: 1) that the trash enclosures be designed in a manner that could accommodate additional recycling bins, and 2) that Building F be designed from a solar perspective to accommodate the 12.5% energy savings. MOTION: It was m/s by Cook- Kallio/Thorne to introduce and waive first reading of Ordinance No. 2011 approving the application for a modification, as conditioned by Council and adopted Resolution No. 10-404 approving the Negative Declaration for the Application of LBA Realty, as filed under Case PUD- 80- 16 -13M. Motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Cook- Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman Noes: None Absent: None 14. Public Hearing: PRZ -57, City of Pleasanton, Hacienda Business Park Rezonings Introduce an ordinance to amend the zoning for three sites in Hacienda Business Park to remove Section 5 of Ordinance No. 1998 and to allow the submittal of development applications consistent with the settlement agreement approved by the City Council on August 17, 2010 in the case of Urban Habitat v. City of Pleasanton. Site 1: Southeast corner of Willow Road and Owens Drive (APN 941 - 2778 -013 and a portion of APN 941 - City Council Minutes Page 5 of 7 October 5, 2010