Laserfiche WebLink
• • - . -, <br /> goals during the current I lousing Element period, it has 0 ° :. future <br /> - , _ .hewing factors: <br /> a. <br /> • - Future job growth in- Pleasanton; <br /> Local environmental constraints, including traftic; <br /> • . ... - . tire; <br /> TM- Regional traffic issues and their ' • - . e - ' • . . <br /> Sub regional issues such as air quality and water availability; and <br /> Economic conditions at the . , • -, . . . <br /> . • si+tg <br /> . .. - .. , strategy one, this information i; availabl. <br /> Urban Growth Boundary: The City's Urban Growth Boundary has been incorporated into <br /> Pleasanton's General Plan as an expression of the practical limits to the City's physical <br /> boundaries. The northern and eastern boundary lines represent other City limits, Dublin and <br /> Livermore, respectively, beyond which Pleasanton cannot extend. The western and southern <br /> boundaries, comprised on steep slopes and ridgelands, reflect the joint policies of the City, <br /> Alameda County. and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to avoid development <br /> in topographically and environmentally constrained lands and encourage development within <br /> in -fill areas of existing City limits. Its intent is not to limit growth but to promote "smart <br /> growth" by focusing new housing in areas which can be readily serviced and which avoid major <br /> environmental issues. The City's analysis of approved and potential new units shows that the <br /> City can meet its share of the regional housing needs within its Urban Growth Boundary. <br /> The City can also be pro- active in the attainment of housing affordability. Sending positive <br /> signals to non- profit and for- profit developers interested in building affordable housing through <br /> incentives can attract such development to the City. Creating educational programs to inform the <br /> public what "affordable housing" developments can look like and that they are intended to house <br /> people who may already live and work in the community are positive steps which government <br /> can take to overcome perceptions and to facilitate housing to meet the community's needs. <br /> Non - Governmental Constraints <br /> Non - governmental constraints to housing production and affordability include market conditions <br /> such as land costs, construction costs, and the availability of financing that affect the cost of <br /> housing. These costs are not directly related to Local government regulations or policies. <br /> Land Costs: The cost of land is a major determinant of the price of housing. Not only does the <br /> City not have direct control of land costs, but the cost of land is also a function of the regional <br /> housing market; therefore, any efforts the City may make in this area would be limited. <br /> Nonetheless, the City's ability to influence the supply of developable land which is zoned for <br /> housing can result in the production of more housing, which may have a positive influence on <br /> housing cost. As a result, Tables IV -15, -16, and -17 identify land with residential development <br /> 65 <br />