My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
111610
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2010 2:43:01 PM
Creation date
11/10/2010 2:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/16/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
building would be situated within an existing office complex located on the corner of Franklin <br />Drive, with access from Stoneridge Drive or Washington Mutual Way. Clorox would occupy the <br />5 existing buildings at the complex, as well. <br />Mr. Dolan described the proposed building, the majority of which would be just below 40 feet <br />tall, with some variations in height and screening. He reviewed the site and landscape plans as <br />well as the exterior service yard. He explained that a PUD modification is required not because <br />of the use, but rather because a new building is being requested. While the building is <br />significant, it would not accommodate more than forty employees itself, with roughly 700 across <br />the entire campus, and the intensity of use is anticipated to decrease significantly over what <br />previously existed. <br />He discussed staff's concerns related to visibility and integration with the surrounding area, and <br />said he believed the applicant had managed to satisfy each. A recent issue brought to light <br />regarding hazardous materials and stressed that there will be no use occurring at this site that <br />does not already take place at their current location on Johnson Drive. The applicant will be <br />subject to a permitting process through the fire department, which should address these <br />concerns. <br />Vice -Mayor Thorne asked if the Fire Chief is satisfied with the proposed facility as it relates to <br />the containment of hazardous materials. The Fire Chief confirmed, stating there have been no <br />issues with the current facility and he is confident this would be the same. <br />Councilmember Cook- Kallio asked if companies such as Clorox undergo any special monitoring <br />related to hazardous waste. Fire Marshall Danielle Stefani said the City implements two <br />programs related to hazardous materials, the Fire Code and CUPA. In that capacity, they <br />enforce the Hazardous Materials Business Plan laws Hazardous Waste Program, and <br />Underground Storage Tank Program. As part of those programs, they issue operating permits <br />and inspect premises at least annually for compliance. She said Clorox is one of their very best <br />corporate citizens. <br />Councilmember McGovern said she reviewed the plans and requested more information on the <br />"burn room." She asked if any condition of approval prohibits its use on Spare the Air Days. Ms. <br />Stefani said she believed it relates to the charcoal manufacturing. Mr. Dolan said the applicant <br />would also be required to get a Bay Area Air Quality Management District permit, which would <br />stipulate when that specific component could operate. City Manager Nelson Fialho believes the <br />Fire Marshall was correct in its use, deferred to the applicant for more specific information, and <br />said the Council could add the limitation as an additional condition of approval if desired. <br />Mark Whiteley, Cannon Design, clarified that Clorox tests and not manufactures charcoal at its <br />facility. He did not anticipate that any larger amounts than are currently tested in the existing <br />facility would be tested here. He noted there are certain other hurdles to be overcome with <br />respect to air quality and the current facility meets all standards. The filtration proposed will be <br />superior to that in the existing facility and he did not believe the use exceeded tolerances for <br />Spare the Air Days. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked how many employees were housed by the previous use. Mr. <br />Fialho said Washington Mutual had approximately 1,300 employees on the site. Reports for <br />Clorox are between 700 and 900, with roughly 40 at the research and development facility. <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 4 of 7 October 5, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.