My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090710
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
CCMIN090710
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2010 2:29:11 PM
Creation date
10/20/2010 2:26:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/7/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN090710
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dr. Howard Long said the churches own Pleasanton Garden and that the people are happy <br />living there and they and their families will suffer great distress when the residents are evicted <br />from their homes due to a plan based on misleading information which was presented to the <br />Council. He said the misleading information is based upon wanting to have a higher level of <br />handicapped accessibility standards. Members of the various churches were brought together to <br />build this, the mortgage will be paid off in July, and they do not need the bureaucracy of <br />affordable housing and do not want to be evicted. <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />14. Consider Cases PUD -57, PUD -68, and PUD -80 Establishing Planned Unit Development <br />Plans including Allowed Uses for Hendrick Automotive Group, Continuing Life <br />Communities, and a Neighborhood Park/Storm Water Detention Basin at Staples Ranch, <br />and Consideration of Agreements for the Staples Ranch Project, including a Development <br />Agreement <br />Assistant City Manager Steve Bocian gave a PowerPoint presentation, showing the Stoneridge <br />Drive Specific Plan area, 1 -580, El Charro Road, and the Arroyo Mocho, the 124 -acre Staples <br />Ranch site, the PUD areas, the land use map, the CLC project, the Auto Mall, the Neighborhood <br />Park, the Community Park, and the Retail Center. He said the Retail Center and Community <br />Park are not being addressed tonight and staff anticipates a separate PUD for each. There is; <br />however, general information included in the development agreement relative to the Retail <br />Commercial site, but not the actual development that will occur on site. This will be subject to <br />future review by the City Council. <br />Mr. Bocian presented a site plan laying out the projects, the Council- approved Community Park <br />Master Plan. He recapped the August 24, 2010 Council meeting, stating that the Council <br />approved all environmental work relating to the development. All PUD's have been approved by <br />the Planning Commission. The City has been meeting with the City of Livermore on a regular <br />basis regarding the construction of El Charro Road and the most recent information provided by <br />Livermore is that they intend to begin the construction process for El Charro Road shortly after <br />the first of the year, and the Pleasanton staff intends to work on the annexation process as <br />quickly as possible. <br />Mayor Hosterman said she had hoped for a November LAFCO meeting, noting the Board only <br />meets every other month. Mr. Bocian explained that there is a meeting set next week and staff <br />will have a better understanding of the schedule. He said City staff and the Alameda County <br />Surplus Property Authority (SPA) are interested in moving forward quickly, but a lot of <br />information needs to be prepared, and much depends on LAFCO staff. <br />Senior Planner Robin Giffin presented the Hendrick PUD, stating that the development includes <br />6 dealerships, 3 car washes, proposed building square footage of 292,000 square feet, and a <br />PUD site of approximately 37 acres in size. She reviewed the tree planting proposal, <br />landscaping screens, elevation drawings for some of the building. She displayed locations for <br />the proposed freestanding signs, individual dealership pylon signs, and monument signs. As <br />conditioned, all signage details would be subject to a formal design review process prior to <br />construction. She also reviewed the parking lot lighting standards noting that all interior lighting <br />would be turned off and all exterior lighting would be reduced to 10 foot candles during non- <br />operational evening hours. The proposed conceptual lighting plan adheres to all foot candle <br />mitigation measures. As conditioned, all exterior lighting would be downward facing and <br />shielded and no rooftop lighting is proposed. <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 4 of 15 September 7, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.