My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 ATTACHMENT 13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
101910
>
13 ATTACHMENT 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 3:54:28 PM
Creation date
10/14/2010 11:45:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENT 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Market Assessment and Fiscal Impact Analysis <br /> of the Pleasanton Gateway Business Park <br /> Report 3/31/10 <br /> Police <br /> The General Fund cost for additional police protection services is estimated based the <br /> department's existing average cost per daytime population. Specifically, as shown in Table 14, <br /> based on the current budget there are about 1.23 sworn officers per 1,000 in daytime population <br /> with an average cost of about $170,400 per sworn officer. The average cost per sworn officer is <br /> based on the Police Department's non - administrative budget and is applied to the sworn officers <br /> required per increase in the daytime population associated with the Project. Based on this <br /> methodology, the Project will generate demand for 1.29 additional officers at buildout, at a total <br /> annual cost of about $220,000. <br /> It is important to note that the approach described above is conservative because it does not <br /> account for any existing service capacity. Specifically, the Police Department has reported that it <br /> has sufficient capacity to provide adequate service to the Project at build -out with negligible <br /> additional costs. However, EPS has calculated the additional costs based on a fair -share <br /> allocation rather than actual costs. This approach ensures that the Project does not get a "free <br /> ride" by benefiting from the department's existing service capacity. As new development occurs, <br /> the City may ultimately need to hire new officers and the burden of this service expansion should <br /> be spread evenly across all development rather than allocated entirely to the last project. <br /> Fire <br /> The Project is located within the Pleasanton- Livermore Fire Department jurisdiction. Station #4, <br /> at Oak Vista Way and Bernal Avenue, is the closest station to the Project, located within a 1/2 mile <br /> from the development site. Assuming that accessibility is sufficient, the incremental approach is <br /> used on per- daytime population to estimate the ongoing fire protection costs. The average cost <br /> per firefighter is estimated based on the City's budget and is applied to the daytime population <br /> generated by the Project (see Table 15). <br /> Public Works <br /> The Department of Public Works is responsible for administration, engineering, traffic, building <br /> safety, street maintenance, and support services to the City. This analysis assumes that 50 <br /> percent of these costs are variable, which yields a per- daytime population cost of $78 according <br /> to the City's budget. <br /> Parks and Community Services <br /> New employment resulting from the Project will create additional demand for City parks and <br /> potentially other community services. The parks and community services cost is assumed to be <br /> 50 percent variable, with a per- daytime population expenditure of $70 according to the City's <br /> budget. The costs associated with the Project's transition to the City's park (to the south of the <br /> Project) will be fully maintained by the Project and are not included in this analysis. <br /> Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24 F:\180005118181 %easanton1Repon\18101tpt8.8oc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.