Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Narum inquired if changing the paint colors would be considered a major <br /> modification. <br /> Mr. Pavan replied that he would look at the color palette for the project and if the <br /> change in color is comparable and attractive, he would be inclined to consider this a <br /> minor change. He noted, however, that if a change to the building volume, roofline, or <br /> something comparable is proposed, this would push it into something more significant <br /> and would be considered major. He confirmed that this would also apply to the other <br /> pads as well. <br /> Mr. Dolan added said it is a judgment call and that staff has a strong sense of <br /> self - preservation such that if staff believes it will be controversial, they would make it a <br /> major modification. <br /> Chair Olson referred to Condition No. 44 and noted that No. 22 under Permitted <br /> Uses /Retail indicates "Drugstores or prescription pharmacies, no drive - through" and <br /> suggested that "no drive - through" be struck. <br /> Mr. Pavan stated that if a pharmacy were to come in with no drive - through, it would be a <br /> permitted use; however, if the pharmacy includes a drive - through, it becomes a <br /> conditional use. <br /> Chair Olson referred to Condition No. 44, Conditional Uses /Retail No. 7, and stated that <br /> he is disappointed that this project does not include the gas station but that he is glad to <br /> see that it has been left in as a permitted use. <br /> Commissioner Pentin corrected that this is a conditional use. <br /> Chair Olson inquired if a self- service gas station could be installed at some point in the <br /> future. <br /> Mr. Pavan said yes. He added that not only is it a conditional use, but would also <br /> require a major modification. <br /> Referring to signs, Chair Olson stated that while he is opposed to flashy signs in the <br /> window of a bank, he grew up in the grocery business and this would be the first <br /> grocery store in the country that would not be allowed to put a sign in the window <br /> indicating what the daily specials are. He stated that he would be disappointed if the <br /> City told Safeway it could not put a sign in their window. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he was also disappointed to see that the gas station <br /> was no longer a part of the proposal. He inquired whether, given this, would the <br /> Jack -in- the -Box people be screaming about competition should a fast -food restaurant <br /> come in on Pad 4; and would the Starbucks Coffee people be screaming about <br /> competition if a Peet's Coffee came in. He expressed concern that there is a level <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 25, 2010 Page 6 of 14 <br />