Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton Gateway— Environmental Checklist <br /> Transportation and Traffic section of the Initial Study, the development is <br /> conditioned to implement measures to improve street and intersection levels -of- <br /> service and to reduce office vehicle trips. These measures include, but are not <br /> limited to, on- demand electric /hybrid vehicle charging stations provided with the <br /> office buildings, trip reduction programs for the office workers including four -day <br /> work weeks, telecommuting infrastructure and car - pooling. Together, these <br /> measures will reduce the potential emissions from idling vehicles queued at <br /> intersections and /or freeway entrances. <br /> Therefore, this would be a less - than - significant- impact. <br /> d) The closest source of air pollutants that may affect public health is the 1 -680 <br /> freeway adjoining the west side of the site. A commercial /office land use is not <br /> considered to be a sensitive receptor to poor air quality because the <br /> commercial /office tenants and visitors are primarily indoors and, therefore, are not <br /> exposed to pollutants for extended periods of time. Therefore, the project would <br /> not expose residents to substantial pollutant concentrations and this would be <br /> considered no- impact. <br /> e) The proposed project will result in the construction of a commercial /office and is <br /> not expected to produce post construction objectionable odors. Therefore, this <br /> would be considered no- impact. <br /> f) The Lamphier- Gregory report analyzed the project's GHG emissions using a <br /> combination of BAAQMD's URBEMIS 2007 model ( "URBEMIS') and the <br /> BAAQMD GHG model ( "BGM ") for total CO emissions from transportation, <br /> electricity use, waste, and refrigerants, etc. Default model settings were used <br /> except for the following: <br /> . Trip generation, pass -by trip (traffic already using the adjacent roadway) <br /> percentages, and diverted -link trip (when a diversion is made from the regular <br /> route to make an interirn stop) percentages were used from the Traffic Impact <br /> Study completed for this Project by Fehr and Peers for the City of Pleasanton <br /> (June 2009, with a partial update in November 2009), where available or <br /> similarly conservative rates were assumed. <br /> . Trip length and average speed information was entered from the Trip Length <br /> Analysis performed by Dowling Associates that used the City's Travel Demand <br /> Model and was able to identify characteristics of office and retail trips in this <br /> particular area. <br /> . The emission analysis also accounted for the market shift that is anticipated to <br /> occur for the proposed grocery store and restaurants — Pleasanton residents <br /> who currently leave Pleasanton for such services will switch to the local <br /> services instead, resulting in fewer total vehicle miles traveled. By shopping at <br /> the project — for example, on their way to /from work and home — Pleasanton <br /> residents will drive less than they would have otherwise, so no additional <br /> vehicle miles traveled were added to the GHG models for these trips. <br /> Page 24 of 52 Pleasanton Gateway Initial Study August 2, 2010 <br />