My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 ATTACHMENT 03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
101910
>
13 ATTACHMENT 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2010 11:24:59 AM
Creation date
10/14/2010 11:24:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Gateway- Environmental Checklist <br /> I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and <br /> a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. <br /> X I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, <br /> there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been <br /> made by or agreed to by the project proponent and a MITIGATED NEGATIVE <br /> DECLARATION will be prepared. <br /> I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an <br /> EVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. <br /> I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially <br /> significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been <br /> adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) <br /> has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on <br /> attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze <br /> only the effects that remain to be addressed. <br /> I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, <br /> because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR <br /> or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided <br /> or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or <br /> mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. <br /> - nt ?feat? Ile .,mt2, 20/0 <br /> Marion Pavan Date <br /> V. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> The following checklist contains the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G <br /> of the CEQA Guidelines. The checklist forrn is used to describe the impacts of the <br /> Proposed Project. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the <br /> checklist. Included in each discussion are project specific mitigations, which have been <br /> incorporated into the project design as a part of the Proposed Project. <br /> For this project, the following designations are used: <br /> • Potentially Significant Impact: An impact that could be significant and for which <br /> no mitigation has been identified. If any potentially significant impacts are identified, <br /> an EIR must be prepared. <br /> • Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: An impact that requires <br /> mitigation to reduce the impact to a less--than- significant level. <br /> • Less Than Significant: Any impact that would not be considered significant under <br /> CEQA relative to existing standards. <br /> • No Impact: Any impact that does not apply to the project. <br /> Page 16 of 52 Pleasanton Gatevvay Initial Study August 2, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.