My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
100510
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2010 2:11:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2010 2:11:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/5/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> As a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) "entitlement city," the City is <br /> responsible for the preparation of an annual performance report called the Consolidated <br /> Annual Performance and Evaluation Report, or CAPER. The CAPER is intended to <br /> provide a systematic format for reporting on the use of CDBG entitlement funds and is <br /> required by Section 104(e) of the Housing and Community Development Act. The <br /> CAPER provides detailed information on the use of CDBG funds by subrecipients (the <br /> agencies receiving funds) during the prior fiscal year. <br /> The CAPER process is intended to provide an opportunity for public participation and <br /> input at the local level. The information submitted in the report provides an evaluation <br /> of grantee and jurisdiction performance to HUD. The CAPER is forwarded to HUD in <br /> Washington after holding a public hearing and receiving City Council approval. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The agencies that received funds in FY 2009 are listed in the attached Table P -1. <br /> Table P -2 provides a summary of the following statistics for each of the agencies which <br /> received CDBG funds in FY 2009: 1) use of funds (budgeted vs. spent); 2) subrecipient <br /> accomplishments / project status; 3) performance measures (a new requirement that <br /> was recently introduced by HUD); and 4) statistics on households and /or persons <br /> assisted (e.g., number of beneficiaries, income level, ethnicity, family status, etc.). <br /> As shown in Table P -2, CDBG and City funds allocated in FY 2009 benefited 2,068 <br /> primarily low- income individuals through various projects, programs, and services <br /> coordinated through subrecipients. The information contained in Table P -2 was <br /> submitted by subrecipient agencies and is consistent with staff's evaluation of agency <br /> activity. <br /> In addition to this statistical information, an important element of the CAPER process is <br /> the opportunity for presentations by each of the subrecipient agencies. At a meeting of <br /> the Human Services Commission held on August 18, a schedule was established to <br /> enable presentations by each agency which received FY 2009 CDBG funds. The <br /> minutes of this meeting are included as Attachment 3. In addition to a discussion of <br /> statistical information for each CDBG project, most agencies elaborated on "human <br /> interest" and other aspects which were not apparent in project statistics. Agencies also <br /> expressed their thanks to the Commission and to the City Council for the support <br /> offered through the CDBG funding. <br /> Because of the fact that agencies had the opportunity to make detailed presentations at <br /> the August 18 Human Services Commission meeting, the public hearing requirements <br /> have been substantially addressed. However, agency representatives or other <br /> interested members of the public will have the opportunity to make comments <br /> concerning the CAPER at the October 5 meeting. Similarly, the Council and public may <br /> raise issues for discussion. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.