Laserfiche WebLink
take in the future to monitor more closely how State laws are being formed and for the City to <br />have a say in those before they become final. <br />She voiced appreciation for Ms. Dennis' perspective on how the housing units will be allocated <br />for a target group, and she thinks that even though the City lost the housing cap, it has not lost <br />the ability to control growth. The City just needs to ensure it does so in a legal manner while <br />also ensuring the quality of life. In addition to the subcommittee's work, she also recognized the <br />amount of time staff spent on the matter and said it virtually stopped other items coming before <br />the City. She thanked everybody who worked so hard on negotiations and the final agreement <br />and thinks it is incumbent on the City to satisfy all of the conditions of the settlement as quickly <br />as possible. She thanked Mr. Brown for his work and also his exceptional job of summarizing <br />the matter. <br />She said the City needs to gear up to complete an updated Housing Element with smart growth <br />management policies that protects Pleasanton and is consistent with State law, and she <br />supported the agreement's approval. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne said he continues to feel the City has the best agreement it could have <br />possibly arrived at under the circumstances, and one that achieves all of the goals originally <br />shed as a Council for negotiations. He thinks any decision the Council might have made to <br />continue litigating would have created an expensive, black hole, and he supported moving <br />forward. Even the settlement agreement preserves as much local control as possible. He voiced <br />redundancy in his concerns about the State's seizure of cities' local control over land use and <br />other issues. He believes that the best route for taking some of this local control back in this <br />case is a comprehensive growth management plan that does take into account the RHNA <br />numbers and makes sure the City has a good dispersion of the kinds of housing it should have <br />in the community. He also thinks that the City should take a look at social services that might be <br />available within the community, which also needs to be part of the consideration. He fully <br />intends to do anything he can locally and through the California League of Cities and other 18 <br />boards and commissions he sits on to preserve and defend the City's right to local control over <br />land use issues. He is sure the rest of the Council feels the same way, and he asked to keep in <br />mind that passing legislation that impacts local land use control is something easy for the State <br />legislature to do, as it does not cost anything to them, but does for Pleasanton. He thinks <br />everybody needs to be diligence in our interactions, not only with State legislature but also with <br />other groups the Council is in contact with to ensure it is doing everything it can to preserve <br />local control over its own land use. <br />MOTION: It was m/s by McGovern /Cook - Kallio to approve a Settlement Agreement between the <br />City of Pleasanton and Urban Habitat Public Advocates and Attorney General. Motion passed <br />by the following vote: <br />Ayes: Councilmembers Cook - Kallio, McGovern, Sullivan, Vice Mayor Thorne <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: Mayor Hosterman <br />BREAK <br />Vice Mayor Thorne called for a five - minute break, and thereafter reconvened the regular <br />meeting. <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 7 of 11 August 17, 2010 <br />