My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051810
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
CCMIN051810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2010 12:00:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2010 12:00:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN051810
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Sullivan announced that he would not support the motion due to the <br /> governance structure. <br /> MOTION: It was ms/ by Cook- Kallio/Thorne to adopt a Resolution No. 10 -368 approving the <br /> Joint Powers Agreement creating the Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC) and <br /> approving an amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement for the Alameda County Congestion <br /> Management Agency (ACCMA). Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Cook- Kallio, McGovern, Thorne, Mayor Hosterman <br /> Noes: Councilmember Sullivan <br /> Absent: None <br /> 15. Approve the principles of agreement regarding Nevada Street utilities /road extension and <br /> process for City consideration of related zoning, PUD and development agreement for the <br /> Irby, Zia, and Kaplan properties <br /> Director of Community Development Brian Dolan gave the staff report, stating that the City <br /> needed easements and rights -of -way and approached the three property owners to determine <br /> whether the City could secure them. While agreement could not be reached on the price, they <br /> discovered mutual interests between the parties. What is before the Council is an agreement to <br /> provide that right -of -way and to also embark upon a cooperative planning process for the three <br /> subject properties referred to as the Irby, Zia and Kaplan properties, and members of those <br /> families are in attendance tonight, represented by Peter MacDonald. <br /> Mr. Kelcourse said, in anticipation of the Vineyard corridor being developed, a number of utilities <br /> and infrastructure was proposed. Included in the 1990 and 1994 CIP were funding for both <br /> water and sewer utilities. The sewer and water master plan anticipated water tanks, sewer <br /> pump lift stations, sewer and water lines, water pump stations, the realignment of Vineyard <br /> Avenue and storm drain improvements. Most improvements have been completed within the <br /> last 10 years either through City projects or through private development. The most recent <br /> construction occurred when the City completed the Bernal Avenue Bridge, where the sewer line <br /> was constructed and placed across the Arroyo. The last portion of improvements include water <br /> and sewer lines that would be constructed in Nevada Street from Bernal Avenue to Stanley <br /> Boulevard. <br /> Mayor Hosterman indicated that the matter had been discussed several months ago, and she <br /> questioned where the City was in building the pipeline. Mr. Kelcourse replied that the plans have <br /> been done for some time, but they are simply lacking the right -of -way. <br /> Mr. Dolan referred to the agreement with the property owners. When the three owners first <br /> brought the idea to staff to consider a planning process, it was appealing because the General <br /> Plan states that the area is appropriate for commercial development. It is unique in that the <br /> zoning is agriculture. State law states the City must be consistent in the two documents. <br /> Therefore, eventually consistency must be generated. The policy statement on the property <br /> states commercial, and this is the proposal the three owners brought forward. <br /> Staff met with Mr. MacDonald and over a period of time discussed what might be appropriate. A <br /> variety and range of uses was explored, as well as development levels and design standards <br /> and guidelines. They envision in the agreement that they would go through the normal public <br /> hearing process through the Planning Commission and Council which would ultimately result in <br /> a rezoning of the property to a PUD and include a development agreement. Staff would set forth <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 10 May 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.