My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
072010
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 4:10:28 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 4:10:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
land included within the annexation application shall pay its pro rata share of all usual <br /> annexation processing and related processing fees applicable to the property proposed for <br /> annexation, as required by LAFCO in order to process the annexation application. In the event <br /> that Property Owner pays all of such processing and related fees, it shall be entitled to seek <br /> reimbursement from any other owner of property included in the annexation application. If <br /> LAFCO or any other agency having jurisdiction seeks to impose any condition to its approval of <br /> the City's annexation application, which condition materially affects the Project and is <br /> unacceptable to Property Owner in Property Owner's sole discretion, Property Owner may <br /> request City to withdraw its application and terminate annexation proceedings for the Property, <br /> and may oppose annexation of the Property to the City. <br /> 4.3 Partial Annexation. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude annexation of only <br /> a portion of the Property, provided that both Property Owner and City agree to such partial <br /> annexation. In such event, the Parties agree to cooperate in good faith to amend or modify the <br /> Project Approvals, if deemed necessary by the City and agreed to by Property Owner, to ensure <br /> that each Party hereto maintains the benefit of the bargain notwithstanding such amendment or <br /> modification, and any time periods imposed under the Project Approvals for completion of an act <br /> shall be deemed extended for the amendment or modification to be processed and to allow for <br /> processing of amendments or modifications to the County approvals as provided in this Section <br /> 4.3. Nothing in this Section 4.3 shall obligate City to proceed with a partial annexation of a <br /> portion of the Property. <br /> 4.4 Termination. If, notwithstanding the good faith efforts of' Property Owner and <br /> City, annexation is not final and effective 24 months following the Effective Date "Annexation <br /> Deadline'), this Agreement shall be deemed terminated and the City and Property Owner shall <br /> have no further obligations under this Agreement, unless the City and Property Owner mutually <br /> agree, in writing, to waive or modify this provision on or before the Annexation Deadline. In the <br /> event that Property Owner, after consultation with the City and exhaustion by both parties of <br /> reasonable efforts to effectuate satisfaction, reasonably determines at any time prior to the <br /> Annexation Deadline that one or more of the Annexation Conditions cannot by satisfied on or <br /> before the Annexation Deadline, then Property Owner shall have the option to unilaterally <br /> terminate this Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section 4.4, <br /> the City shall withdraw any application for, and take all steps necessary to, terminate then <br /> pending, if any, annexation proceedings for the Property. <br /> 4.5 Rescission of County Approvals. <br /> (a) Within ninety (90) days from the date of annexation, Property Owner shall <br /> request. provided that there are no lawsuits or initiative or referendum measures pending that <br /> would adversely affect the annexation of the Property to the City or the Project Approvals, that <br /> the following approvals granted by the County Board of Supervisors on August 1, 1996 be <br /> rescinded: certification of the EIR; adoption of the Bernal Property Specific Plan; rezoning of the <br /> Bernal Property from the A (Agricultural) to the PD (Planned Development) District (2011th <br /> Zoning Unit) subject to certain exhibits (Exhibit B, the Land Use and Development Plan, and <br /> Exhibit C, Provisions of Reclassification); and the development agreement by and between <br /> Alameda County and the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through its PUC. <br /> 35690/84937$v14 23 0625/00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.