Laserfiche WebLink
possibility of housing on the site but he feels that it is important to maintain the <br /> property's current entitlement. <br /> The Planning Commission then closed the public hearing and found the proposed <br /> extension to be consistent with the Pleasanton General Plan and the Bernal Property <br /> Specific Plan. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> The Bernal Property Specific Plan, PUD development plan, and Development <br /> Agreement are covered by the Final Environmental Impact Report, San Francisco <br /> Water Department Bernal Property, approved by the City Council on March 1999 in <br /> compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As the physical <br /> environment has not significantly changed since that time, and the extension of the <br /> Development Agreement does not modify the approved project, no further <br /> environmental document accompanies this extension. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> This extension will enable Pleasanton Gateway to proceed with its office development if <br /> the economic climate improves. This extension will not alter or modify the entitlements, <br /> obligations, and responsibilities described in the Development Agreement as they <br /> specifically apply to the Pleasanton Gateway property, which shall remain consistent <br /> with the Pleasanton General Plan and with the Bernal Property Specific Plan. <br /> Submitted by: Approved by: <br /> O <br /> Brian olan Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of City Manager <br /> Community Development <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Draft Ordinance dated June 20, 2010 with the Amendment to the Development <br /> Agreement for Pleasanton Gateway, L.L.C. <br /> 2. Original Development Agreement, dated September 27, 2000. <br /> 3. Minutes of the May 12, 2010 Planning Commission public hearing. <br /> 4. Location Map <br /> 5. Public Notice Area Map. <br /> 4 <br />