Laserfiche WebLink
Advantages: <br /> The only alternative that assures the end of this litigation with petitioner and <br /> intervener. <br /> Recognizes the interests of both parties and sets parameters for moving forward. <br /> Perhaps the fastest alternative to return permitting authority to the City. <br /> Disadvantages: <br /> Require areas of compliance that may be overturned in future litigation <br /> Will result in the elimination of the housing cap and changes to the Hacienda <br /> development review and approval process. <br /> May require an accelerated schedule for matters related to amending the General <br /> Plan to eliminate the housing cap and preparation of the Housing Element. <br /> Summary <br /> The City Council is considering at a second public meeting this matter to both educate <br /> the public and to get its input regarding available options. Following this meeting, the City <br /> Council intends to provide direction to staff and legal counsel regarding a preferred <br /> course of action. Due to the timetable established by the Court, it is anticipated that this <br /> direction will occur within 7 to 14 days of this meeting. The Council will continue to keep <br /> the community informed as this matter progresses. <br /> Submitte1--- Alt/ <br /> Approved, by: <br /> /P ,t/ <br /> Brian Dolan Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Community Development City Manager <br /> Attachments <br /> 1. April 6, 2010 City Council agenda report and attached Court Order <br /> 2. Resolution 96 -89 Authorizing the Placement on the November 5, 1996 Regular <br /> Election of City Sponsored Initiatives. <br /> 3. References to the Housing Cap in the 2005 2025 General Plan <br /> 4. Alameda County RHNA allocation <br /> 5. California Department of Housing and Community Development Housing Element <br /> law summary <br /> Page 11 of 11 <br />