My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
072010
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 12:09:17 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 12:09:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT <br /> 47: REGIONAL CONNECTION FEES <br /> DSRSD Policy <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Policy No.: <br /> Policy Title: Project Cost Allocation <br /> a. Flow based Example: new biosolids dewatering technology will be installed at the <br /> Wastewater Treatment Plant to accommodate 10 mgd of current flow and an additional <br /> 6 mgd of future flow split 62.5 %/37.5% replacement /expansion. <br /> b. Product based Example: A new generator may be installed to use excess gas available <br /> from the anaerobic digesters as a fuel supply; the excess originates as 500 cubic feet per <br /> day digester gas from existing users (replacement and itprovement funds) and 9,500 <br /> cubic feet per day from future users (expansion funds) split 5%/95% Regional <br /> replaccment/expansion. <br /> c. Employee based Example: A new maintenance facility to accommodate 8 existing <br /> staff (replacement and improvement funds) and 3 staff that will be added as the District <br /> grows (expansion funds). split 72.7 %/27.3% to replacement/expansion in the <br /> appropriate enterprise or enterprises. <br /> d. Customer Based Example: A project to support the general administration of the <br /> District and /or that provide a general benefit to all customers of the District -split based <br /> upon the number of customers served by each enterprise. <br /> 4. If the above guidelines do not represent an equitable allocation of costs due to the specific <br /> circumstances associated with that project, the General Manager may propose an alternative <br /> allocation methodology for the Board's consideration. <br /> 5. All project allocations shall be approved by the Board at the time it approves and/or modifies <br /> project budgets. <br /> 11Mloard \lede-e9\PoIicy Project Allocation\ProJcct Cost Allocation Policy.doc <br /> BLACK VEATCH 34 MAY 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.