My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
072010
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 12:09:17 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 12:09:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT <br /> REGIONAL CONNECTION FEES <br /> Appendix B DSRSD Engineers Report <br /> ANALYSIS OF CURRENT AND PROJECTED <br /> REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT FLOWS <br /> David A. Requa, District Engineering Engineer <br /> April 2010 <br /> The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the wastewater flows required to be treated at the Regional <br /> Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) when the General Plans of the three cities served by thc District <br /> reach build out. The result of this study provides the basis to update required capital improvement <br /> projects to meet the needs of future customers of the District. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The District is a member of the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency (LAVWMA) a <br /> Joint Powers Authority (JPA) along with the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. The JPA owns and <br /> operates pump stations and pipelines to transport wastewater effluent from the valley to San Francisco <br /> Bay for disposal. In 1997, the JPA was amended to provide for the expansion of the disposal system and <br /> to set influent wastewater limits for thc three member entities. <br /> Since the JPA amendment, the District has use the influent limit which is 20.7 million gallons per day <br /> (mgd) for the District and Pleasanton combined, as the basis of capital improvement planning (CIP) and <br /> determination of regional connection fees. During the preparation of a regional connection fee study in <br /> 2008, the approach was modified to use the General Plan buildout of the 3 cities served by the District <br /> which was estimated to be 17.8 mgd at the time. To support the connection fee study, staff reduced the <br /> total cost of the CIP for regional expansion to approximate the cost reduction from 20.7 to 17.9 mgd. <br /> However, the CIP document was not revised. <br /> In December of 2009, the District Board of Directors reviewed the policy issue of the proper basis for CIP <br /> and regional connection fee planning. The Board adopted use of the buildout of the General Plans. A <br /> modified CIP document has now been prepared' to reflect the Board policy. <br /> EXISTING TREATMENT CAPACITY <br /> A major Stage 4 expansion of the WWTP was completed in 2003. As required by the Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board, upon completion of the expansion, the WWTP was stress tested to document the <br /> 2 "CIP Process Capacity Review Whitley Burchetl Associates; May 2009. <br /> BLACK VEATCH 20 MAY 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.