My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
072010
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 12:09:17 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 12:09:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICE DISTRICT <br /> REGIONAL CONNECTION FEES <br /> 3. Value of Service. System development charges are based on non direct cost based <br /> considerations such as the fees that other area utilities charge, estimated opportunity or <br /> substitute costs, et al. Unlike the system buy -in or incremental cost pricing methods, this <br /> method does not require extensive analyses in valuation and cost determination. <br /> Revenues derived from system development charges are commonly used to offset part or all <br /> capital costs to accomplish any of the following objectives: <br /> 1. To pay the capital costs of future capacity provided for growth. <br /> 2. To provide rate relief to existing system users by recovering that portion of the annual <br /> existing and future capacity capital costs associated with growth, including debt service <br /> requirements and direct asset purchases from current revenues. <br /> 3. To accumulate reserves to finance system improvements and expansions required to <br /> meet growth needs. <br /> Since the system buy -in method for developing system development charges requires the <br /> selection of a basis for determining plant value, a discussion of asset valuation methods follows. <br /> Asset Valuation Methods <br /> Various methods are employed to estimate the value of utility facilities required to furnish service <br /> to new users. The two principal methods commonly used to value a utility's properties are original cost <br /> and reproduction cost. <br /> Original Cost <br /> The principal advantages of the original cost method lie in its relative simplicity and stability, <br /> since the recorded costs of tangible property are held constant. <br /> The major criticism levied against original cost valuation pertains to the disregard of changes in <br /> the value of money over, which are attributable to inflation and other factors. As evidenced by history, <br /> prices have tended to increase rather than to remain constant. Because the value of money varies inversely <br /> with changes in price, monetary values in most recent years have exhibited a definite decline; a fact not <br /> recognized by the original cost approach. This situation causes further problems when it is realized that <br /> most utility systems are developed over time on a piecemeal basis as demanded by service area growth. <br /> Consequently, each property addition was paid for with dollars of different purchasing power. When these <br /> outlays are added together to obtain a plant value the result can be seriously misleading. <br /> Reproduction Cost <br /> Changes in the value of the dollar over time, at least as considered by the impact of inflation, can <br /> be recognized by reproduction cost property valuation. The reproduction cost represents the cost of <br /> duplicating the existing utility facilities at current prices. Unlike the original cost approach, the <br /> reproduction cost method recognizes price level changes that may have occurred since plant construction. <br /> The most accurate reproduction cost valuation would involve a physical inventory and appraisal <br /> of plant components in terms of their reproduction costs at the time of valuation. However, with original <br /> cost records available, a reasonable approximation of reproduction cost plant value can most easily be <br /> ascertained by trending historical original costs. This approach employs the use of applicable cost indices <br /> BLACK VEATCH 4 MAY 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.