My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
061510
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 3:59:05 PM
Creation date
6/10/2010 3:17:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
efforts of the City's regional partners to support funding and construction timing of <br /> regional improvements that benefit City, and community concerns. <br /> SEIR Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative <br /> The Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative is similar to the preferred project in <br /> that it would temporarily stripe Stoneridge Drive traffic lanes so that only one traffic lane <br /> would cross each bridge in each direction. It is different, however, than the preferred <br /> project because it would allow the traffic lanes over each bridge to be restriped to allow <br /> two lanes of traffic in each direction only when certain regional traffic improvements had <br /> been completed. <br /> Finding: Infeasible <br /> The Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative would initially have the same impacts <br /> as the preferred project due to the Stoneridge Drive bridges being striped with one lane <br /> in each direction. Because, however, the bridges would remain striped for one traffic <br /> lane is each direction until certain regional traffic improvements are completed, the Two <br /> Lane Constrained Extension Alternative, would have fewer impacts (such as traffic and <br /> noise) than the preferred project if the City Council, in its discretion under the preferred <br /> project, decides to restripe the bridges before those regional improvements are <br /> completed. The cumulative impacts of the Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative <br /> (which does contemplate the eventual restriping of the Stoneridge Drive bridges for two <br /> lanes of traffic in each direction), however, would be the same as the preferred project. <br /> The City finds the Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative infeasible because it <br /> fails to provide the City the flexibility it desires in managing its roadways. Concerns <br /> have been expressed by some members of the community about the impacts that will <br /> exist in other parts of the community if the full, four lane extension of Stoneridge Drive is <br /> not implemented. The Two -Lane Constrained Extension Alternative would tie the City <br /> Council's hands by events out of its control and would prevent the City from exercising <br /> its discretion as to when Stoneridge Drive should have two traffic lanes in each direction <br /> after consideration of changing traffic conditions, the efforts of the City's regional <br /> partners to support funding and construction timing of regional improvements that <br /> benefit Pleasanton, and community concerns. <br /> Alternative Project Site <br /> An alternative location was not assessed because such an analysis is not warranted for <br /> a specific plan project, and, as stated in the EIR, the Project Sponsor does not own <br /> other, comparable property within the City of Pleasanton's sphere of influence. <br /> Environmentally Superior Alternative <br /> Section 15126(e)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines requires identification of the <br /> environmentally superior alternative. <br /> 16 <br /> Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.