My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
061510
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2010 3:59:05 PM
Creation date
6/10/2010 3:17:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/15/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
No Project Alternative (No Build) <br /> Description <br /> The existing Project Area would remain as it currently exists. None of the project <br /> components (i.e., auto mall, senior continuing care community, commercial center, <br /> community park, and neighborhood park/detention basin) would be constructed. With <br /> the No Project Alternative, the existing Project Area would remain undeveloped, thereby <br /> failing to satisfy the project objective to develop the site with economically beneficial <br /> land uses. It is unlikely that the Project Area would remain undeveloped far into the <br /> future, since development of the area has already been approved as part of the 1989 <br /> Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan; however, in the short term for the purposes of this <br /> alternative, the area would remain unbuilt. <br /> Finding: Infeasible <br /> By preventing development of the Project Area, the No Project Alternative would avoid <br /> or substantially reduce the significant and unavoidable impacts of the approved project <br /> to aesthetics and visual quality, air quality, noise and traffic. <br /> This alternative is infeasible, however, because it is inconsistent with the City's planning <br /> goals. A no build alternative would fail to make responsible use of a site that has been <br /> planned by the City for urban uses for 20 years. It would not comply with the direction <br /> of Pleasanton's General Plan for urban uses of the project site and would fail to <br /> substantially implement a Specific Plan that has already been approved by the City. <br /> The No Project Alternative is also infeasible because it is inconsistent with the <br /> objectives of either the proposed project or the preferred project, both of which include, <br /> among others, guiding the development of the Staples Ranch site with a mix of <br /> economically beneficial uses, retaining existing auto sales businesses within the City, <br /> providing senior continuing care amenities, and providing community recreational <br /> facilities. <br /> Existing Specific Plan Alternative <br /> Description <br /> Under the Existing Specific Plan Alternative, the land uses that were approved as part <br /> of the 1989 Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (1989 Specific Plan) for the Project Area <br /> would be developed. Of the 124 acres that comprise the Staples Ranch site, 1.5 acres <br /> that lie within the City of Pleasanton would remain zoned as PUD- Medium Density <br /> Residential, but this area would be developed with a portion of the community park. No <br /> residential units would be constructed under this alternative. The remaining 122.5 acres <br /> of undeveloped land in unincorporated Alameda County would be annexed into the City. <br /> The land use designations for this area, according to the 1989 Specific Plan, include <br /> Service Commercial and Light Industrial, Retail and Service Commercial, and <br /> Community Park. <br /> 7 <br /> Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.