Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner O'Connor indicated that this was covered in Condition Nos. 31 and 32. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that it was clear that enclosed accessory structures <br />outside the building envelope would be included in the 8,500 sqaure -foot maximum. <br />Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the proposed condition regarding fencing included <br />no solid fencing on the perimeter only or on all places of the lots. <br />Commissioner Blank replied that the only reason he suggested no fencing on the <br />perimeter is that a small fence might be proposed off of a house or around a hot tub for <br />privacy reasons. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that page 6 of the Landscape Design Guidelines states that <br />fencing is not allowed along the perimeter of the lots, rather than fencing is allowed at <br />the perimeter of the building envelope, and that it must be open fencing. <br />Commissioner Blank amended the motion to allow only open fencing at the <br />perimeter of the building envelope. <br />Commissioner Blank and Commissioner Narum indicated that the amendments were <br />acceptable to them. <br />Chair Olson voiced his disappointment that vineyards are not allowed. <br />Commissioner O'Connor also voiced disappointment that two lots were lost. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, Pearce, and Pentin. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolutions Nos. PC- 2010 -07 recommending approval of the Mitigated Negative <br />Declaration and PC- 2010 -08 recommending approval of Case PUD- 87- 19 -03M were <br />entered and adopted as motioned. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 28, 2010 Page 11 of 11 <br />