My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
060110
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 5:25:48 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 5:12:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review Procedures <br />The proposed guidelines state the design review procedures for these homes. The first <br />review stage is peer review provided by the subdivision architect, Gorny Associates. <br />After this stage is completed and the subdivision architect has approved the design plans, <br />formal application for design review approval by the Zoning Administrator would then be <br />made to the Planning Division. With the notification of the Zoning Administrator's action <br />sent to the Planning Commission, staff will provide the approval letter, conditions of <br />approval, and the plan set including colored building perspectives and building elevations. <br />Development Standards <br />The proposed development standards for Lots 1 through 4 are stated in the building design <br />guidelines. Given the large area of these lots, staff believes that the buildings on these <br />lots can be located up to the building envelope lines given the proposed separations <br />between building envelopes and property lines, and that the setbacks should be based on <br />the separations from slope banks, swales /seeps, and the geotechnical building setback <br />lines, i.e., the minimum building setback should not allow a house to encroach into these <br />sensitive areas of the site. Therefore, staff recommends the following uses and site <br />development standards: <br />a. The permitted and conditional uses of the R -1 (One Family Residential) District as <br />described under Chapter 18.32 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code. <br />b. Development Standards for Primary Structures and Accessory Structures: The <br />following building setback and height standards shall apply to the primary <br />structures, additions to primary structures including second units, and accessory <br />structures on these lots: <br />Building Setback All paving, ornamental landscaping, and structures including <br />pools shall be contained entirely within the building envelopes. There are no <br />setbacks per se from property lines or from the edge of the envelope. A <br />minimum 10 -foot setback is required from any structure to the drip line of any <br />existing tree that will be required to be preserved. This setback standard is <br />consistent with the wildland fire management plan. Paved surfaces may extend <br />to the edge of the tree's drip line but may not be extended underneath the tree's <br />canopy areas. <br />Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 8,500 square feet, exclusive of 700 square <br />feet of garage area, whichever is less. (Note: Garage floor area over 700 <br />square feet will be added to the building floor area.) <br />Maximum Height/Open and Enclosed Accessory Structures 15 feet. The <br />maximum height for any accessory structure shall be measured vertically from <br />the lowest point of the structure to the highest point of the structure. (Note: The <br />floor area for enclosed accessory structures shall be included in the sites' floor <br />area ratios.) <br />The final copy of the revised guidelines will be based on the detailed engineering drawings <br />and incorporating the approved PUD development plan conditions plus the requirements of <br />Item 6.b., PUD- 87- 19 -03M <br />Page 24 of 37 April 28, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.