My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
060110
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 5:25:48 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 5:12:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In lieu of a lot cluster, the applicant would create relatively small <br />building envelopes distributed across the project site with large <br />separations of natural topography and vegetation between the building <br />envelopes thereby separating the individual homes. Hence, the <br />proposed site design makes the most sense given the site's <br />topography and natural features, and the limited number of lots <br />proposed. <br />2. WFRCOD: B. "Building sites within lots shall not be allowed if they are located on <br />or near ridges, which do not have a background of Pleasanton or Main <br />Ridges when viewed from Foothill Road. Landscaping in the form of <br />mature trees may be allowable background for such ridgeline sites if <br />the decision making body finds that the landscaping will preclude the <br />structure from dominating the skyline as viewed from Foothill Road." <br />Project: The proposal meets this standard. All four lots of the proposed project <br />are located below the 590 -foot to 600 -foot elevation of the site. The <br />height of the Pleasanton Ridge due west of the Yee property varies <br />from 1,600 feet to 1,800 feet. As shown on Figures 4 through 7 (pp. 8 <br />through 10), the slopes on and behind the Yee property are <br />predominantly tree covered. <br />3. WFRCOD: C. "Use of individual driveways directly intersecting directly onto <br />Foothill Road should be prohibited; combined, common access <br />driveways serving more than one lot shall be encouraged where <br />topography, grading and similar considerations make such roadways <br />feasible." <br />Project: The proposal meets this standard. Lots 1 through 4 will be accessed <br />from the existing private street. All access rights to Foothill Road from <br />the proposed lots will be abandoned upon recordation of the first final <br />subdivision map for the development. <br />4. WFRCOD: D. "Mature, native trees within the district shall be retained to the <br />maximum extent feasible. Where feasible, mature oak and other <br />native species should be relocated to grassland areas planned for <br />development in order to soften the effect of new development within <br />the corridor. New development landscaping shall be predominantly <br />native plant species in areas visible from Foothill Road, with lawn or <br />turf areas in landscape schemes adjacent to Foothill Road either <br />eliminated or hidden by native landscaping." <br />Project: The proposal meets this standard. Existing trees are predominantly <br />California buckeye, California sycamore, coast live oak, and valley oak <br />species. The proposal includes four lots with each lot having a <br />designated building envelope for development. The oak woodland <br />areas outside the designated building envelope areas will be covered <br />by deed restrictions. Each building envelope is subject to site specific <br />design review where the placement of structures will be reviewed <br />Item 6.b., PUD- 87- 19 -03M <br />Page 17 of 37 April 28, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.