Laserfiche WebLink
State Clearinghouse for distribution. Staff also sent the IS /MND to the COAS, CNPS, <br />COF, and the USFWS representatives directly after the State Clearinghouse referral of the <br />IS /MND. Staff has not received formal comment from these agencies to date. As <br />conditioned, the applicants must receive all their agency permits before the City will issue <br />its permits to allow construction to begin. <br />The environmental issues of this application have been evaluated by the applicant's <br />consultants in the attached reports. They were, in turn, evaluated by staff; were peer <br />reviewed by an outside environmental consultant retained by staff and by responsible <br />Federal and California State agencies; and are addressed with applicable conditions. <br />Staff, therefore, considers the Mitigated Negative Declaration to be the appropriate <br />environmental instrument for this application and that it can be issued in conformance with <br />the California Environmental Quality Act. <br />Scope of the Discussion and Recommendation <br />The four -lot project will preserve the existing trees adjoining Foothill Road by the channel <br />thereby maintaining the appearance of this portion of the site facing Foothill Road. To do <br />this, however, means that the 180 -foot to 200 -foot section of the bicycle lane in this area of <br />the site will not be constructed; the other sections of the bicycle lane will be constructed <br />along the remaining sections of the project's Foothill Road frontage. On the short section <br />of Foothill Road by the channel, bicycles and cars will use the same travel lane. <br />The Planning Commission had directed staff and the applicant to preserve the channel, the <br />trees by the channel, and to extend the bicycle lane along the project's entire Foothill Road <br />frontage. Since the Planning Commission's previous direction cannot be completely <br />achieved, staff is, therefore, bringing the revised project with the revised project plans, <br />consultant reports, and IS /MND back to the Planning Commission for the Commission's <br />review and recommendation. <br />The following staff report and revised draft conditions of approval address the areas of the <br />project related to the bicycle lane construction, project phasing, and environmental <br />mitigation. As requested by the applicant, the report also considers an alternative method <br />to measure the building heights for these lots from that established by the West Foothill <br />Road Corridor Overlay District. <br />11. SUBJECT PROPERTY <br />Subject Property <br />In 1989, the City Council approved 20 lots; 14 lots on the Yee property and 6 lots on the <br />Tong property (Tract 6275 Equus Court) under the original PUD approval (PUD- 87 -19). <br />PUD -87 -19 covered an approximately 50 -acre property. The original development plan, <br />attached as Exhibit G, also provided project amenities and open space area, accessed by <br />private streets and an emergency vehicle access (EVA). Figure 2, on the following page, <br />is an aerial photograph showing the boundaries of PUD -87 -19 in red and the lots of Tract <br />6275 and Parcel Map 3692 that are part of PUD -87 -19 in yellow. <br />Item 6.b., PUD- 87- 19 -03M <br />Page 5 of 37 April 28, 2010 <br />