Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton Water Rate Study <br />2. Revenue Requirement Projection <br />proportionate share and that customers within each class are paying their proportionate <br />shares. <br />2.2. REVENUE REQUIREMENTS <br />The deficits in Figure 2 indicate a widening gap between expenses and revenues. <br />Closing this gap by decreasing expenses is difficult because the single largest cost, Zone <br />7 water purchases (64% of the total revenue requirement), is a pass through cost that is <br />not controlled by the City. The remaining 32% for the local City O &M and capital <br />expenses has only increased at sub inflation rates over the last five years. Further local <br />cost reductions are no longer possible without significant reductions in service levels. <br />With little opportunity to reduce costs, revenues must increase. City staff identified <br />two areas to increase non -rate revenue. First, the General Fund will provide $330,000 <br />annually to reimburse for the senior /low- income discount in water bills. Second, the <br />City will recover more revenue from its backflow prevention program. City staff also <br />identified one area where it was under collecting revenue from approximately 1,350 <br />accounts with 1" services that were being charged for 5/8" services; this correction will <br />generate $250,000 annually. <br />The addition of $580,000 annually from the foregoing three areas is not sufficient to <br />cover the deficit. An additional revenue increase of 21 is sufficient to nearly match <br />the revenue requirement with revenue in FY 2010 -11, which is the first time this has <br />occurred since FY 2005 -06. This revenue increase brings rate revenue on par with the <br />revenue requirements, but does restore the fund balance to previous levels. <br />With a higher revenue increase, reserves could be replenished and funding for the <br />capital improvement program increased to previous levels. However, at this time, the <br />magnitude of the recommended rate increase is such that City staff prefer to moderate <br />increases through FY 2014 -15. After the recommended increase for FY 2010 -11, City <br />staff proposes annual increases based on two components. <br />1. Costs associated with Zone 7 purchases will be adjusted equal to increases in <br />Zone 7's annual rate increases, which are determined on a calendar year basis. <br />Zone 7's current rate projections are shown in Figure 2 2. <br />2. All other costs, which are associated with the City's local O &M and capital <br />expenditures, will be adjusted based on the CPI. <br />March 18, 2010 Page 9 HF &H Consultants, LLC <br />