My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
060110
>
14 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 5:23:36 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 5:04:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton <br />Water Rate Study <br />1. Introduction <br />Revenue stability Rates are designed to recover revenue from the City's fixed <br />and variable charges that will adequately cover its fixed and variable costs, <br />barring water shortages when rationing is required. <br />Conservation signal Rates are designed to recover the cost of service from each <br />customer class and, within each class, to provide appropriate rewards for <br />efficient water use and to discourage waste. <br />Administrative ease Rates are designed to enable easy implementation and <br />ongoing administration, including monitoring and updating. <br />Affordability Rates need to be as affordable as possible while maintaining a <br />sound financial position and credit rating. <br />Customer acceptance Rates are designed to be as simple as possible to facilitate <br />customer understanding and acceptance. <br />Fairness Rates are designed so that each customer class pays its proportionate <br />share of the required revenue in compliance with legal rate making <br />requirements. <br />In the current rate study, a key consideration was encouraging efficient water use <br />within the SFR customer class, which is where considerable discretionary irrigation <br />occurs. The existing set of three tiers in the residential consumption charges was <br />developed over 15 years ago after the last major drought. The City Council determined <br />that adding a fourth tier would focus the price signal on the appropriate customers, <br />given today's customer demand patterns, thereby rewarding low use and discouraging <br />high use. <br />The result of adding a fourth tier to the residential rates raised the question as to <br />whether it still made sense to include MFR customers in the residential class. In order <br />to do so, adjustments have been made to the multi- family use based on the size of the <br />meter connection. These adjustments factor the use in proportion to the capacity of the <br />connection, but have been applied inconsistently. Moreover, landlords receive the bill, <br />rather than the end -user tenants. As a result, the tiered price signal is not as effective. It <br />was concluded that it would be more equitable and easier to administer if the MFR <br />customers were moved from the residential to the commercial customer class. <br />City staff concluded that the seasonal irrigation rate structure should be converted to a <br />uniform structure. The City's seasonal rates were designed to encourage efficiency <br />during the peak irrigation season. To do so, the high peak season rate was balanced <br />with a very low off -peak rate in order not to charge more than the cost of service to the <br />irrigation class over the course of a year. <br />Seasonal rates are best suited for systems where there is little off -peak demand. In the <br />City's case, however, there is significant irrigation during the off -peak that benefits <br />from the very low rates; it is possible that not all of the irrigation customers use their <br />March 18, 2010 <br />Page 6 HF&H Consultants, LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.