Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br />March 18, 2010 <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br />Water Rate Study <br />Table of Contents <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 <br />Findings And Recommmendations 1 <br />Implementation 2 <br />1. INTRODUCTION 5 <br />1.1. Current Rates 5 <br />1.2. Rate Making Objectives 5 <br />2. REVENUE REQUIREMENT PROJECTION 8 <br />2.1. Expense and Revenue Projections 8 <br />2.2. Revenue Requirements 9 <br />3. COST -OF- SERVICE ANALYSIS 11 <br />3.1. Revenue Components 11 <br />3.2. Revenue From Service charges 11 <br />3.3. Revenue From Consumption Charges 11 <br />4. RATE DESIGN 14 <br />4.1. Rate Making Objectives 14 <br />4.2. Residential Consumption Charges 14 <br />4.2.1. Existing Tiers 14 <br />4.2.2. Recommended Tiers 15 <br />4.3. Commercial and Irrigation Consumption Charges 16 <br />TABLE OF FIGURES <br />Figure ES -1. Cost -of- Service Allocation Summary 3 <br />Figure ES -2. Consumption Charge Summary 4 <br />Figure 1 -1. Current Water Rates 7 <br />Figure 2 -1. Financial Trends 10 <br />Figure 2 -2. Zone 7 Projected Rate Increases 10 <br />Figure 3 -1. Cost of Service Summary Consumption Charge Revenue 13 <br />Figure 4 -1A. SFR Bill Distribution With Existing Tiers 17 <br />Figure 4 -1B. SFR Bill Distribution With Recommended Tiers 17 <br />Figure 4 -2. Comparison of SFR Tiered Rate Structures 18 <br />Figure 4 -3. Comparison of Current and Recommended SFR Structures 18 <br />Figure 4 -4A. SFR Graphical Bill Comparison 19 <br />Figure 4 4B. SFR Tabular Bill Comparison 19 <br />Figure 4.5A. Commercial Graphical Bill Comparison 20 <br />Figure 4.5B. Commercial Tabular Bill Comparison 20 <br />Figure 4.6A. Irrigation Graphical Bill Comparison 21 <br />Page i HF&H Consultants, LLC <br />