My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
060110
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 4:27:36 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 4:27:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
community in general, and that would be more supported by adjacent neighborhoods. While he <br /> said that kind of information or response would not be available on May 4, staff does expect to <br /> report on the issue early this summer. <br /> Cy Matin reiterated his request for a City sponsored jobs center, much like what the City of <br /> Livermore is able to offer Tri- Valley residents. <br /> Karla Brown spoke against Measure D. <br /> Paul Ebright reported a campaign sign stolen from his property and noted his opposition to <br /> Measure D. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted that for several years, residents urged the Council to place the matter <br /> on the ballot, and now that it has, residents are saying the opposite. She reminded the public <br /> the matter would be on the June 8th ballot and urged them to do their homework. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 10. Public meeting to provide information to and receive input from the public regarding the <br /> judge's order in Urban Habitat v. City of Pleasanton and possible City Council actions in <br /> response to it <br /> Tom Brown, Chief Counsel, Hanson Bridgett, summarized his report as stated at the April 6, <br /> 2010 Council meeting. <br /> Mayor Hosterman said it is important for the public to know that their elected officials have been <br /> involved in every aspect of these discussions. She and Councilmember McGovern have <br /> attended every meeting and both will continue to do so. She asked Mr. Brown to discuss the <br /> fact that the state cannot mandate homes, and rather that it is interested in cities zoning for the <br /> potential future growth of cities in order to reach the state's idea of what housing numbers ought <br /> to be. <br /> Mr. Brown said it is clear in both the statute and case law that, while the City is obligated to plan <br /> and zone to accommodate for the possibility of housing development, it is in no manner <br /> obligated to either build it or commit any public resources towards it. <br /> Mayor Hosterman stressed that the public should not be fearful that, sometime in the next 2 <br /> years, the City is going to build 5,000 homes. She also asked Mr. Brown to discuss potential <br /> growth management efforts that would ensure the maintenance of local control in light of the <br /> overturned housing cap. <br /> Mr. Brown stated that since the cap was adopted in the mid 1990s, both State obligations and <br /> the understanding of how to manage growth have evolved. He said there are many tools based <br /> on the limits of local infrastructure and the ability to provide public services which are proven to <br /> allow for the accommodation of state housing obligations while still helping to maintain local <br /> growth control. These approaches are something the City could look at as part of a compliance <br /> or settlement approach and are something he is confident could withstand judicial scrutiny. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted the City needs to embark upon a Housing Element update, which is a <br /> very public process in this City, and said this represents an ideal opportunity to discuss these <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 9 April 20, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.