Laserfiche WebLink
.741. TAirs <br /> u a <br /> a -4,444474:-.. w S <br /> *4��Ir tie "e'ao.. 4,h-t. <br /> t- ^11 <br /> f e 3P a `llle �yF. I r <br /> If 4i I <br /> w.. 4FOU A �»i men <br /> 4 ate 1' x y. j>.,, <br /> d i <br /> 4 4 <br /> 4. r <br /> s t It t j ThreaN• •I:uild <br /> AA C/ r On N a Qjf+ •r. <br /> ai_ NI <br /> t1 ight -C <br /> Figure 1: Civic Square Apartment Development and Surrounding Uses. <br /> IV. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING (12 -Unit Proposal) <br /> On March 25, 2009, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposal by Civic Square, <br /> L.L.C. (Braddock and Logan Services, Inc.) to construct 12 new apartments at its Civic <br /> Square development. The Planning Commission staff report and meeting minutes are <br /> attached. Andy Byde, representing Braddock and Logan, spoke in favor of the proposal <br /> and answered questions. There was no other public testimony. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed two issues on the proposal: the feasibility of <br /> providing photovoltaic panels on the roof areas of the new and remodeled buildings or <br /> making them photovoltaic ready, and reserving the 12 new apartments exclusively for <br /> moderate /low- income households. After discussing these questions, the Commission <br /> concluded that photovoltaic panels were not feasible and that the low- /moderate- income <br /> apartments should be distributed throughout the development and did not add any <br /> conditions on these issues with its recommendation. The Planning Commission voted <br /> 4 -0 to recommend approval of the application, subject to staffs recommended <br /> conditions. <br /> Item 6.b., PUDM- 84- 21 -04M Page 3 of 17 March 10, 2010 <br />