My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
050410
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2010 3:12:10 PM
Creation date
4/29/2010 3:12:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/4/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MTC Claim Application Document 1(b) <br /> TDA Eligibility Statement Article 4.5 8 <br /> FY 2010 -11 Operator: City of Pleasanton <br /> Submittal Date: 5/4/2010 <br /> This form must be signed and dated <br /> 1. The Calculated Fares -Plus -Local -Match Recovery Ratio from Document "H- 4.5 &8" is: 78.8% <br /> Select the eligibility statement below, pertaining to the service(s) for which operating <br /> funds are being requested, and enter the calculated ratio shown above in the <br /> appropriate cell highlighted yellow. <br /> Pursuant to PUC §99275.5 (for Article 4.5 claimants) or PUC §99405(c) (for Article 8 claimants), operator <br /> qualifies under MTC Resolution No. 1209, Revised as a "Special Transit Service" claimant, and is required to <br /> achieve a fares plus local- match recovery ratio (as defined in MTC Resolution No. 1209, Revised) of a <br /> minimum ten percent. <br /> 2. The Calculated FY 2010 -11 Budgeted Fares -Plus -Local -Match Recovery Ratio is: l <br /> OR <br /> Pursuant to PUC §99275.5 (for Article 4.5 claimants) or PUC §99405(c) (for Article 8 claimants), operator <br /> DOES NOT qualify under MTC Resolution No. 1209, Revised as a "Special Transit Service" claimant, and is <br /> required to achieve a fares plus -local -match recovery ratio (as defined in MTC Resolution No. 1209, Revised) of <br /> a minumum twenty percnt. <br /> 3. The Calculated FY 2010 -11 Budgeted Fares Plus -Local -Match Recovery Ratio is: <br /> OR <br /> In accordance with PUC §99268.12, and MTC Resolution No. 1209, Revised, the operator is in a county with <br /> 500,000 population or less and serves an urbanized area, and in a prior fiscal year MTC made findings (or is <br /> requested to make findings for the budget fiscal year) related to the size and density of the urbanized area in <br /> which the services to the general public are provided, and the proportion of the operator's ridership which is <br /> transit dependent (including elderly, handicapped and low income patrons), and MTC has set (or is requested to <br /> set) the required fares plus -local -match recovery ratio at Tess than twenty percent, but not less than fifteen <br /> percent. <br /> 4. The Calculated FY 2010 -11 Budgeted Fares Plus -Local -Match Recovery Ratio is: I <br /> OR <br /> In accordance with PUC §99270.2 (applicable to newly- designated urbanized areas) the operator is requesting a <br /> recovery ratio exemption. <br /> 5. The Calculated FY 2010 11 Budgeted Fares Plus Local Match Recovery Ratio is: I <br /> This claim covers which year of the exemption (check one): <br /> 6. 1st of 5 years 2nd of 5 years 3rd of 5 years 4th of 5 years 5th of 5 years <br /> Non Compliance With Fare or Fares Plus Local- Support Recovery Ratio Requirement <br /> Operator has failed to comply with fare or fares plus local- support recovery ratio requirement during the <br /> following fiscal years: <br /> 7. type the fiscal years in here <br /> (see instructions for a discussion of the "Penalty Due to Noncompliance" in accordance with PUC §99268.9) <br /> The undersigned attest that to the best of their knowledge, the budgeted recovery ratio(s) <br /> shown above is /are accurate and correct. <br /> Sign Date <br /> Susan Andrade -Wax, Director of Parks Community Services <br /> Sign Date <br /> David P. Culver, Finance Director <br /> MTC Programming and Allocations Section February 2005 Page 'I of 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.